The One may be anything. The One is everything yet not. intervals and non-being are some of the more intriguing aspects of God. Why should any initial dialectical exchange of particles such as exist betweeen quarks and everything else exchanging the strong nuclear force for example arise. From absolute nothingness virtual particles of uncertain composition arose. Where they one dimensional strings or zero dimensional membranes?": How could a space-time exist for those particles to be gathered together in to form a black hole? What determined the initial size of the space-time vacuum? What determined the initial size and quantity of virtual [articles, strings or dimensional configurations? I think that the vacuum space-time before the big bang could be either vast or small. That some spiritual power generated the material appearance of a field of energy seems probable, other wise the field would have had to have an infinite series of preceeding material causes and that is fundamentally no logical.
The One that is God in Three persons has no need for a physically extending field himself. The One is perfect. Therefore the size or absolute scale of the initial space-time field is arbitrary and relative...it has no absolute size and has scale relative to other creations. Perhaps the created is an inverse field of negation brought into being by The One by removing his omniscience and omnipresence from those sentient and created elements appearing within it. Emanations from the One of virtual particles would be the most singular zero dimensional membrane elements appearing within the range of vacuum and Universe to be perceived or inferred by created beings subsequently. The Universe is therefore brought into existence through concatenated ongoing physical processes that are self-consistent as diversifications of a unified force to integrate and appear as things for-themselves. Those sentients beings within the subsequent Universe discuss if they are evolved or created. Not much of a grasp on logical opportunities there.
From the initial monism an appearance of pluralism may arise.
Languages may form in a Universe created by The One. An Intelligence and a Soul may emanate of The One to issue a Universe through whatever means. The Word may send rippling frequencies throughout a zero dimensional membrane shattering it into different forms.
The waveforms differ in frequency, phase and amplitude from others positions in what is now space time. The reverberation and counter-direction recombination of wave forms designed by the omniscient mogue panc (mind plan) has issued a pluralist appearance with and expanse of power initially provided in perfect order. It processes through thermodynamics as an eventuating Universe in space-time configuration. It inflates and seems to exploded from a small point or singularity that was simply a bottleneck in the hour glass of billions of years. We have a Universe that expands. Eventually prophets receive the instructions about how to describe the will of the Creator for humanity to progress (don't drink any blood you idiots) and so forth.
"Could god be an evolutionist and not a creationist?" God may have theistically evolved the Universe. It does have time and time is not an instantaneous timeless eternity of One omnipresence in which all things exist simultaneously in potential and actuality. Instead the universe and its time is a chip off the old block. There may have been a vacuum perturbed with virtual particles appearing 13.7 billion years ago that formed a black hole concentration of virtual particles in some way transitioning into a repulsion and expansion into several dimensions.
Perhaps virtual particles have a maximum packing density before space repulses them. The inflation of the Universe began day one of God's creation perhaps. Even William Jennings Bryan cross-examined by Clarence Darrow in the Monkey trial had to stipulate that God's time values given in the book of Genesis for the six days of creation were probably not literal human days but were instead God days or eons to us humans. Einsteinian relativity would find that an acceptable interpretation of such things. Yet we should be careful not to put new wine into old skins, or into old bottles as the King James Bible I have says. I doubt if Luke had ever seen a glass bottle, and Jesus might have referee'd to clay fired jars instead. Translators of ancient terms have an indeterminacy of translation that makes life and understanding ancient language use circumstances a little cloudy.
The end times description of Jesus in Mathew have much imagery that suggests modern cosmological referents. The book of Genesis is a phased creation story of a compiling evolution of the Universe and Earth. Each 'day' may have been a couple billion years our time, yet we should not even accept the premise that God is in some way limited to constructing a Universe within the criterion of the forces that he made to exist. The Universe is contingent being rather than vice verse. God isn't subject to the natural constant physical values he let evolve, any more than a General Motors auto worker must be a gas guzzling SUV instead of inventing some new form of hovercraft over in-highway power lines transit-craft platform.
Each of an infinite number of Universe God may have created could be made with physical laws in accord with the issued frequencies of The Word of God.
With Plotinus we wonder at the creative capability of The One and why he issued a Universe or anything else, and are grateful that The Son appeared upon the Earth to afford and opportunity for those of faith to renormalize their relationship with The Father through his incredible saving grace.