Home > Arts & Humanities > Philosophy > Ethics
Created on: October 26, 2009 Last Updated: April 23, 2010
By what can man be judged? Or can man be judged? In order to answer to these questions, a few founding principles must be established. By Judged I do not necessarily mean the stereotypical religious judgment of fire and brimstone. By judgment I mean the value system and the discernment of the properties of actions and things.
We exist as active persons. This is one of the fundamental truths which all people must accept for morality to exist, much less a moral truth. Active persons, otherwise known as moral agents, have the ability to choose and act in accordance to their own will and judgment. Without will, no action is moral or immoral, because one cannot be wrong for committing an action which one had no ability to resist. As C. S. Lewis, the most famous apologist, said, without free will we are all automatons programmed by fate, god, or circumstance. This is not to say that we are not predisposed to actions or are completely sovereign agents. We choose amongst choices presented to us, therefore our will is limited, but essential to a moral judgment.
The principle of free will being established, we must define morality. This definition must set out not to prescribe those actions, but to explain what morality is. Morality is the set (not necessarily written or codified) of principles that man ought to follow. Men of every generation and nation have the notion that man ought to act in a certain way; the only differences are the manner in which he ought to act and the reasons why he ought to act that way. An Aristotelian believes he ought to find the "golden mean" to achieve "eudemonia"; the subjectivist believes he must follow his own belief because he cannot know any objective value; and a Theist believes he must follow the mandates of his God. These differences are less differences as re-phrasings of the same objective. All men, save perhaps those with certain mental disorders, seek a moral life, but the achieving of that life is sought in different ways. This, however, does not imply that these separate ways are all leading to the same outcome, but that morality is expressed in slightly different ways within different cultures.
Having defined morality and realized that all men seek it, we search for the meaning of moral "truth." This concept is vague and in need of re-defining. Moral truth is the, supposed, objective set of moral guidelines to which all peoples are held, or the guidelines which all men should follow in order to live a moral life. Does
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Discussing the concept of moral truth
by Joshua Jones
By what can man be judged? Or can man be judged? In order to answer to these questions, a few founding principles must be
Moral truth is a compound term of abbreviation for some sort of larger phrase. Perhaps we should inquire:
1)-'is there some
by Gerhard Adam
While I can appreciate the desire for there to be an absolute morality, the reality falls far short. One can create all
by Jishi Santos
Universal truth, truth itself, and then moral truth. That is the order of the 'truths'. 'Universal truth' is that
Well, there is quite a tough job ahead . . . the toughest of them all, I think, as far as this matter of moral truth - of
View All Articles on: Discussing the concept of moral truth
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Appearance & reality: Does it need to be non-temporal to be real?
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Northwoods Wildlife Center has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse Northwoods' featured titles, pick an issue and write! You can also donate your article earnings. Share what you know,...more