Home > Sciences > Physical Science > Physics
Created on: October 21, 2009 Last Updated: October 23, 2009
Back in the late 1950's, ideas for the use of small nuclear reactors for various purposes were in vogue. During that period, when I worked for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, I heard speculation over the possible use of atomic energy to run our autos, heat our houses, lift our rockets to the heavens. Many of these ideas were so wild, they were quickly dropped. However, some small reactors were designed and used for university research projects, medical and industrial isotope production and even nuclear submarine propulsion.
Small nuclear reactors can range in power output from less that one up to several hundred megawatts.
More recently, prospects for a so-called nuclear renaissance have revitalized speculation about the design and use of small reactors in Canada. For example, in an interview with CBC News, in February, 2009, Premier Brad Wall said ... he hoped Saskatchewan could play a role developing small reactor technology. He went on to say the provincial government might be able to devote some resources to research and development in that area.
A report by Saskatchewan's Uranium Development Partnership, (UDP) included an upbeat statement that because they require little or no refueling and produce both heat and electricity, small reactors could eventually compete with small-scale diesel, oil and gas generation as a power alternative in remote sites. The report went on to state that, Saskatchewan has the opportunity to participate in this market by partnering with a commercial technology developer on a demonstration project.
Ah, butthe history of small reactors in Canada includes some very expensive lemons, something that should give pause to anyone seriously contemplating getting into that kind of business.
As an example, one of those not so successful small reactor efforts was the SLOWPOKE 3, a brainchild of Atomic Energy of Canada, Ltd. (AECL).
The Slowpoke became an issue for me in 1986, when I was a spokesperson for the Concerned Citizens' of Manitoba (CCM.), Canada, a nuclear waste watchdog group. After years of our lobbying, the Manitoba provincial government was poised to pass a bill which would prohibit the burial or long-term storage of high level nuclear waste in the Province.
AECL officials were quite upset over the upcoming legislation, one of their concerns being that the bill contained a clause which prohibited the storage of high-level nuclear waste originating from outside the Province for more than seven days. This, according to the AECL
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Determine the best sources of energy for the future
The best forms of energy use are functions of how energy is used. Intellectual energy is of the highest priority. A lethargic
by Gomez Gomez
In order for the energy requirements of the future to be met, an unprecedented development of new energy harvesting technologies
Solar Power: Source of Endless Energy
With Global Warming on many people's minds, do we have any ideas of the best way to
by Rick Badman
For most of my life I have considered nuclear energy the best source of energy available. I still do. It is relatively
by Dan Hiland
Thermal Energy Storage: The PCM- Eutectic Solution
Energy use has always been one of the costs of doing business, and like
View All Articles on: Determine the best sources of energy for the future
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Do oxo-degradable additives really make plastic bags biodegradable?
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
The Center for Responsive Politics (Open Secrets)
The Center for Responsive Politics (CRP) is the nation's premier research group tracking money in US politics and its effect on elections and public policy. Founded in 1983, the nonpartisan, nonprofit Center aims to create a more edu...more