Home > Religion & Spirituality > Atheism & Agnosticism
Created on: September 29, 2009
Religion has been around since Man's inception. Naturally, so have it's detractors. Since the dawn of Man, we have searched for an answer to unanswered questions. Many have turned to a path of faith, others have chosen to look within themselves for the answers. Neither is wrong.
As an agnostic, I have not been convinced that an all powerful being exists, nor do I feel I ever will be. However, that does not take away from my ability to decipher right from wrong or good from bad. Just because a man does not ask God for forgiveness for his misdeeds, does not mean he does not know they are just that, misdeeds. All human beings were instilled with a conscience, which tells us right from wrong. This is a case of nature vs. nurture, not belief vs. non-belief.
A person's morals are conceived during infancy and childhood. It is the people around us who tell us what is right and wrong, and from there we make our own decisions. For instance, a man does not resolve conflict with violence as he was brought up to believe that other means of resolution exist. The man who uses violence, does so not out of instinct, as we've seen we have the ability to ignore our instincts, but out of lack of options. If a man has not been taught other means than what he knows, he will use what he can at the time. His views on the Almighty have nothing to do with this. I have met many a "devout" Christian who rob, steal and hurt others without the slightest consideration for anyone, including God.
While it is true that religion does provide some great moral ethics to follow, how many within it's confines choose to ignore them? Take for example, the priest who molests children. These men are supposed to be regarded with the highest esteem for their purity of heart. These don't sound like very good morals to me. How about the religious fanatics that brought about the crusades and the slaughter of tens of thousands of innocents in the name of God? "To kill an Infidel is not murder, it is the path to Heaven." In today's day and age, would this still be acceptable?
Now, I must clarify here that I am not against believing in a higher power at all. We all have a void in us that needs to be filled, and some choose God to fill that void. What I am against, is the thought that you need God to be a good person. We have seen many men do great things and lead exceptionally pure lives without being in the grace of God, just as we seen many within his grace commit horrendous acts of violence and rape that would not be considered morally right. Morals are individual on a person to person basis, just as common sense isn't as common as we'd all believe.
Learn more about this author, Ryan Richards.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Why athiests and agnostics can have morals
I'd really like to know who it was that decided that you needed some sort of deity in your life in order to live with some
Religion offers a framework for living morally, and it “works” for a lot of people. Neither of these statements
by Bob Lloyd
Atheism is defined by a lack of belief in deities and not by some world view or set of common values. For that reason
Religion has been around since Man's inception. Naturally, so have it's detractors. Since the dawn of Man, we have searched
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Neopaganism and the Environment: Should all Neo-Pagans be environmentalists?
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
ResearchSEA - Asia Research News
ResearchSEA - Asia Research News is Asia's first research news portal. It is a one-stop center where journalists and members of the public can gain access to news and local experts from the research world in Asia. ResearchSEA high...more