Home > Education > Educational Philosophy
Created on: September 20, 2009 Last Updated: December 24, 2009
Rote learning is where pupils learn long lists of facts,figures or sums by repitition and can recite them from memory. Whilst this is useful in learning some basic things, such as the times tables or the alphabet, where it is the only form of teaching and learning used it is narrow and restrictive and does not teach children to think or how to apply that information.
Many people will remember singing their times tables or the alphabet forty or fifty years ago and they can still immediately tell the price of twelve items at 4p each (48p). It is an effective tool for learning such information but, as with all tools, rote learning used to the exclusion of other methods brings troubles of its own. Rote learning by itself brings no understanding. The best teaching of multiplication tables combines rote learning with a practical demonstration showing what for example 2 times 2 looks like and that 2 times two is always the same whether one is talking about people, oranges, elephants or yards of sand.
Children were once taught history by memorizing long lists of dates, but history is boring if presented in this manner. It is far more interesting, memorable and enlightening to visit a museum, or attend an enactment of a historical event, or, when dealing with recent history, to have a pupil's Grandma or Grandpa come in and tell the class how life was. If lessons are boring, children find it difficult to learn and there is no merit in learning lots of facts only to regurgitate them at exam time and then never to take an interest in the subject again.
In France, where rote learning has long been the method of teaching and learning, there is much debate amongst educationalists over whether it is the right way to teach children. The general opinion is that, because rote learning does not teach a child to think or to question, that the French education system produces people who have all been trained to think in the same way and, therefore, does not produce enough innovators and entrepreneurs for a 21st century economy. Those innovators and entrepreneurs that France does have, arise despite the French education system and not because of it. It is also often said that the French education system only educates children to conform and to pass examinations.
Rote learning has a place within the tools necessary to educate a child, but like all tools should not be over-used. Rote learning when combined with other methods can prove an excellent way of imparting basic information and ensuring that it is there for the pupil's use for life. Teaching a child to think, experiment and question are all part of the education necessary to produce a well rounded individual. To condemn rote learning completely is to throw the baby out with the bathwater but it should never be the sole, or even the most prevalent method of teaching and learning. It is, nonetheless, sometimes an extremely useful tool.
Learn more about this author, Maria C Collins.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Why you should say no to rote learning
Rote learning is where pupils learn long lists of facts,figures or sums by repitition and can recite them from memory. Whilst
Teaching by rote is an outdated ineffective way of teaching. It relies on learners remembering and reciting lists of information.
by Vara J.
Rote learning or learning by memorizing is not the optimal learning method since it focuses only on the transfer of information
Although I agree that "rote learning or learning by memorizing is not the optimal learning method...", to assert that rote
Featured Partner
My hope is that every person with cancer can smile because someone touched his or her life. So many of you made Nicki smile! I never imagined that I would devote my life to this cause, but when cancer touched my life it changed everyth...more