Search Helium

Home > Politics, News & Issues > US Politics > Party Politics & Ideology

American liberalism and the Democratic party critiqued

by William Falcone

Created on: September 13, 2009   Last Updated: September 16, 2009

American liberalism has become a philosophy with no backbone. The Democratic Party, historically, has best defined what being a liberal is. There have been some Republican liberals in past years, mostly from the northeast (but not many). So being a liberal can be referred to as a traditional Democrat.

But what does it mean to be a liberal in today's America? Is it simply a more kind-hearted politician who espouses help for the downtrodden and poor?Or is a liberal another form of traditional politician? A politician who also can be bought by the highest bidder.

A point can be made that many elected representatives from both the Republican and Democratic party exist somewhere in that middle ground of no strong political philosophy other than what will work to get re-elected. In today's world of American politics those with the backbone are the right wing zealots. As unrealistic, xenophobic, ethnocentric, and jingoistic as they seem, they say what they think, truth be damned! People know where the zealots stand on the issues. They are clearly for a bloated military/industrial complex intended to pad the wallets of the Dick Cheneys of the world. And they don't apologize for it. They speak of American world dominance, torture as an effective tactic against terrorists, life as beginning at conception (maybe make birth control illegal), and a sort of theocratic democracy as perhaps the best form of governance. You know where they stand!

Now lets compare the demagogues of the right wing with the so called "Liberals". The liberals are supposed to be in favor of universal health care, a down sized military, fairer and more progressive tax structure, and stronger government regulation of industry-especially for those who exploit and destroy the world's natural resources. But who do liberals negotiate with in order to promote their weak "agenda"? Who do they hold their hands out to in order to get enough money to get re-elected?

Since Bill Clinton (and probably before) the liberal backbone has become weakened by their greed for political relevancy. This is for the sake of a watered down agenda that promotes only their own self-interest. Their hands are open for the highest bidder (just like their Republican cohorts.) The liberals doors are open for business to the lobbyists who provide them with the money for election. Favors will always have to be provided to those who buy their way in to office. Sure the liberals espouse a slightly more humane foreign policy with more

87044

Featured Partner

OpenTheGovernment.org

OpentheGovernment.org (OTG) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse OpentheGovernment.org's featured titles, pick an issue and write! You can also learn new perspectives on issues that you ...more


CONNECT WITH US

Read
our blog
Helum for writers

Write and get published
Share with other writers
Polish your freelancing skills

Join our active writing community
Helium Content Source for Publishers

Quality articles from proven freelancers
Exclusive rights, fast turnaround
Brand engagement, business blogging -- our writers do it all

Get custom content today!

INFORMATION


Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA
#