Home > Politics, News & Issues > International Politics > War & Terrorism
Created on: September 03, 2009 Last Updated: September 05, 2009
In Anthony Burgess's classic novel, one of the main characters and our narrator is reduced to A clockwork Orange - a man unable to exercise his own free will - through the use of a closely monitored but controversial technique, touted as the solution to juvenile delinquency and in the case of the story, as a combatant to the socially unacceptable ultra violence that Alex and his "droogs" regularly participate in.
The methods in Burgess's story involve aversion therapy - a method that associates a certain stimulus with a negative or unpleasant sensation - and while doctors and medicos alike will say that it is vastly different from torture (and essentially, it certainly is), what transpires in A clockwork Orange is surely what you and I would consider torturous.
Definitions of aversion therapy may preclude descriptions of torture, but this certainly isn't the case if you consider torture's definitions of severe pain and suffering, physical or mental.
The book's narrator, Alex - through the process of conditioning (the Ludovico technique, as it is called in the novel) - is essentially forbidden to exercise his own moral choices in life, something that the chaplain in the prison where he is initially held, is strongly against and something that he argues, is a necessity to humanity.
Reports on the slowly combusting case of the "secret CIA" prisoner programmes in the International Herald Tribune earlier this week - which initially harked to gross misconduct and a gruesome picture of out of control operatives partaking in sadistic activities - are now claiming (and the story carefully treads the line between vindication and condemnation) that the CIA programme was "closely watched" (August 27) - a sort of Ludovico technique of their own.
The article, outlined specific details of the requirements for each prisoner, which included precise instructions for lighting cells, the exact volume of the constant white noise being played to the suspects being held captive, the temperature of the water to be used for water boarding and for how long, amongst other strict instructions.
While this control was said to ensure that the program was "safe and legal", the article seemingly borders on contradiction when it later quotes a document as stating that "the prisoner finds himself in complete control of the Americans". - Not too unlike our Alex and his Clockwork Orange nature, it seems.
The IHT also makes reference to initial news reports citing "aberrations" in the field (such
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
The ethics of torture in the War on Terror
by Alissa King
Hans Albrecht Bethe once wrote, "If we fight a war and win it with H-bombs, what history will remember is not the ideals
by Karon Brandt
The only "ethical" idea I can see to this would be if the torture of one human being could save the lives of many others.
Most
There's been much ado over the past few years about the use of torture in the Global War on Terror. Many people have said
by Luke Dearden
According to Amnesty International, torture is defined as, "Any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical
"The decision by President Bush to veto the bill outlawing waterboarding and torture in interrogating detainees was shocking.
View All Articles on: The ethics of torture in the War on Terror
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Should soldiers be allowed to opt out of wars they disagree with?
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Presidential Climate Action Project (PCAP)
The Presidential Climate Action Project (PCAP) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse PCAP's featured titles, pick an issue and write! You can also donate your article earnings. Share...more