Home > Politics, News & Issues > US Politics > Political Issues
Created on: August 10, 2009 Last Updated: August 22, 2009
Except for a brief "experimental period" during my college years some twenty-five years ago, I am, and have always been, a non-smoker. As a result, I found myself welcoming the smoking bans which came, first to my workplace and then, eventually to all public spaces in my small, Illinois town. The fact that my cigarette-smoking grandparents died of high blood pressure related strokes at relatively young ages (59 and 64) and my non-smoking parents still appear to be going strong today at ages 78 and 79 was enough to convince me that the Surgeon General's cigarette warnings are not based on "junk science" as many "smoker's rights" groups frequently claim.
I would not, however, describe myself as "passionate" when it comes to the issues related to the dangers of second-hand smoke. I am not an anti-smoking activist by any stretch of the imagination. I agree that there are definitely some dangers associated with long-term exposure to second hand smoke but I also think that automobile and factory emissions probably present similar levels of danger.
For me, second hand smoke was more of an annoyance. I disliked the smell of smoke in my hair and clothing that resulted when my office still allowed employees to smoke at their desks (circa 1985). I also didn't understand smokers; how could they justify spending so much money on something that tasted bad and smelled even worse? And as the years went by and I began to notice, (usually at my high school reunions) that my skin and hair remained much more youthful-looking than that of my cigarette smoking former classmates I found their preference for tobacco all the more confusing. But, I've never been one to presume to lecture smokers on their "bad habit"; nor do I believe that smokers are inherently inconsiderate or evil people. So, as I began casually searching the Internet for ideas on how to address the debate question of whether smoking should be banned in public places I was stunned to discover the level of animosity that seems to be growing between smokers and non-smokers. I can't help wondering whether our newly segregated society which severely limits social contacts between smokers and non-smokers is at least partially to blame.
The levels of extremism (on both the smoking and the non-smoking sides of the fence) were disturbing to say the least. First, I found the FORCES International (Fight Ordinances and Restrictions to Control and Eliminate Smoking) website which included an article entitled "Fighting Anti-Tobacco
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Banning smoking in public areas
It is well documented that tobacco smoke is a health risk to the smoker and the nonsmoker. On the positive side, smoking
by Robin Landry
Except for a brief "experimental period" during my college years some twenty-five years ago, I am, and have always been,
by Pat Gray
Smoking should be banned in public places, but we need to define "public" before we start listing places where smoking is
Those of us who grew up with chain smoking adults went either with the smoking or developed an intense dislike of having
I'll be the first to admit it: I was duped too. I am, like most Americans, a victim of the deceitful rhetoric of the anti-smoking
View All Articles on: Banning smoking in public areas
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Arts for All Ages is a non-profit organization that travels to schools, extended-day programs, daycare's, homeless shelters, and foster homes with the intent of giving children the opportunity to experience and experiment with the perfor...more