Home > Politics, News & Issues > US Politics > Political Issues
Results so far:
| Yes | 77% | 2519 votes | Total: 3260 votes | |
| No | 23% | 741 votes |
Created on: August 06, 2009 Last Updated: August 16, 2009
Do It Right Universal Healthcare Part Two
There are certainly a lot of questions and roadblocks thrown in front of HR 3200 and HR 676. (See Do it right now, July 31 Missourian.) As a reminder, my support is for the universal health plan, HR 676.
On July 24, 2009, Shawn Tully, editor at large for CNNMoney.com, wrote 5 freedoms you'd lose in health care reform. Let me try to respond to each and then the make-or-break question: How to pay for all of this.
1) You'd lose your freedom to choose what's in your plan. Yes and no. With a standard plan designed and administered under either proposed bill, you have no choice in the basics.
That does not prevent private insurers from developing and selling supplemental insurance policies much as Medicare Supplements are developed and sold today. If the government keeps a hands-off approach to these supplements, there could be an unlimited number of combinations and customized programs available.
2) You'd lose your freedom to be rewarded for healthy living, or pay your real costs. Here, Mr. Tully uses an old propaganda tactic of fear and danger to make his point. There is little real proof.
Other than small discounts for healthy living that barely make a dent in the annual premium increases, discounts are few and usually limited to corporations for a percentage of the employees who quit smoking or lose weight. However, individuals rarely see the paper on which these suggested discounts are written.
In fact, a well-designed and promoted national health care system will provide treatments for obesity, smoking, drug addiction, mental illness and more, reducing the expenditures of the programs in the long run.
3) You would lose your freedom to choose high-deductible coverage. Isn't that part of the reason we are in the situation we find ourselves in today? Most Americans cannot afford the high deductibles and co-payments on top of the premium. Out-of-pocket expenses have put too many in bankruptcy. Businessman Ben Franklin would say, "Continuing to do the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is a sign of insanity."
4) You will lose your freedom to keep your existing plan. OK. This one I will concede for HR 676, but not the President's plan. The President has specifically said in press conferences and public meetings that if you like your current coverage, keep it.
5) You will lose your freedom to choose your doctors. Maybe. In HR 676, a participating provider must be either not-for-profit
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Should the United States have universal health care?
Yes
No
View all articles on: Should the United States have universal health care?
Featured Partner
Dogs Deserve Better has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse Dogs Deserve Better's featured titles, pick an issue and write! You can also donate your article earnings. Share what you kn...more