Home > Religion & Spirituality > Christianity > Christian Doctrine & Issues
Created on: August 06, 2009
Evolutionary thought claimed the spotlight in 1859 as Charles Darwin published his renowned work, "The Origin of the Species." Since that time, many scientists have continued to follow in his footsteps and have gone from believing that evolution is a theory to teaching it as a known fact. However, the truth remains, Evolution is and will forever be a theory, and unfortunately has been one of the greatest frauds to be perpetuated on mankind.
The common belief of students in public schools and colleges is that living organisms evolve from non-living chemicals. Why? Because that is what instructors are teaching from their lecterns in biological science classes today. There are many people who believe that scientists have "created" life during scientific experiments because their textbooks bolster evolutionary beginnings. Some choose to base their evolutionary beliefs upon findings made by scientist Stanley Miller.
In 1953, Scientist Stanley Miller decided that he wanted to prove the theory of evolution by creating life in the laboratory. He thought about what must have been present before life began and decided upon a mixture of gases (ammonia, hydrogen, methane and water vapor) that might have made up the earth's atmosphere millions of years ago. He passed an electric current through the gases simulating a lightening strike. From this experiment, he produced a mixture of amino acids. Science teaches us that amino acids are the building blocks of proteins and proteins are in turn the building blocks of life. Evolutionary proponents hailed Miller's experiment as proof that life had evolved millions of years ago.
However, there are some problems with the results of his experiment:
1. Miller had no proof that his choice of gases were the gases which made up the earth's atmosphere.
2. Stanley Miller made sure there was no oxygen present for his experiment. That is a big issue. If there was oxygen present, then amino acids could not form. However, if there were no oxygen present millions of years ago when life developed by chance, then there would be no ozone layer. If there was no ozone layer, then ultraviolet rays would penetrate the earth's atmosphere and then destroy the amino acids as soon as they formed. So, according to Answers in Genesis contributor A. J. Monty White, "The dilemma facing the evolutionist can be summed up this way: amino acids would not form in an atmosphere with oxygen and amino acids would be destroyed in an atmosphere
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Disproving evolution
The theory of evolution is about as close to scientific fact as anything else that is taken by most people to be a fact.
"Real Science" = The ability to prove a formula by being able to re-create it over and over again in a laboratory setting
by Thomas Grace
CHANCE OR DESIGN?
If there were one question that has been asked more than any other in the history of mankind that question
My argument consists of two appeals: the first is to nonbelievers, the second to believers.
Concerning evolution: my biggest
by JC Campbell
The theory of Evolution has been a subject for discussion for more than a century, and though it is still only a theory,
View All Articles on: Disproving evolution
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Concepts4Charity has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse Concepts4Charity featured titles, pick an issue and write! You can also donate your article earnings. Share what you know, lea...more