Home > Politics, News & Issues > US Politics > Government & Policies
Title endorsed in part by:
Created on: August 05, 2009 Last Updated: August 06, 2009
Visit www.pro-ana.com and you will be dazzled by images of emaciated supermodels and movie stars, even tips for hiding dramatic weight loss from parents. All in the hopes that you can be just like those stars or honorably die trying. Anybody would like to say: But it's their right to free speech to post whatever they want. If that is the case, there should be more pro-drug-use websites or pro-homicide websites, even though they're illegal and all that. These sites clearly threaten the well-being of the people of America, or any people for that matter, and should be censored or even banned from the Internet.
The Information Age or the Iron Age?
Censorship. A term that makes even the hardiest of journalists shiver at the thought of having their ideas cut short by an overbearing editor, or possibly a musician whose vulgar lyrics may not have the chance of reaching the ears of an unsuspecting minor. Sure, censorship has been pointed at as a limitation of free speech, but when does free speech in itself become more of a danger than a freedom?
Free speech becomes a danger when it is abused; just as American citizens have the right to bear arms, they can still kill someone in cold blood with that weapon that the right allowed them to obtain. The Internet is a gold mine of free speech information to the public, to political and military officials and even terrorists.
Besides dangerous web sites that are homes to online predators, the Internet caters to rookie terrorists with instructions on how to build bombs or the best way to kill people. These are but a few reasons why censorship should be carried on in the Internet even more so than worrying about it in the music and television industries.
Some people wonder what happens to old technology when something hot and new replaces it. Of course when the new PS3 comes out, the company does not reveal every single detail about its construction and operation, but it will disclose all of the technical information on previous consoles. This is because a rival company would copy its new design and perhaps even improve on it.
So, what is the point here? The point is that all forms of obsolete technology are deemed okay to share with the general public. This rule applies even to military weapons technology which, when considered obsolete, is viewable by the public via online databases. Terrorists intent on inflicting harm on another country or specific people now have unlimited informative resources to build a dangerous
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
In what circumstances is government censorship of media appropriate?
by Earl Mcgill
The first article of the Bill of Rights states, in part, that " Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of
by Brandon Hall
Visit www.pro-ana.com and you will be dazzled by images of emaciated supermodels and movie stars, even tips for hiding dramatic
The media, Americans lifeline to the news. One would hope that the media would practice self censorship, knowing there are
by John Graham
The answer is NEVER.
The government is merely a number of committees that are occupied by people who are elected to enact
For all those who feel censorship itself should be censored, take a step back and look at what we have become as a result
View All Articles on: In what circumstances is government censorship of media appropriate?
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Tomorrow's Peacekeepers Today's short-term mission is to provide vital security information to non-government organizations (NGOs) and recommendations on how to protect third-party nationals while on the ground in foreign countries.more