1 of 24

Yes

Write now Article Tools

Page 2 of 7

hair on the chest, but not much on the back. What hair we do have is streamlined. That is, unlike apes with coarse hair that would weigh them down heavily and make swimming through the water nearly impossible, human hair is made to flow through the water...much like a car is aerodynamically made to push the air around it so it may move smoothly down the road.

There are other aspects, such as babies being born with a water-resistant, waxy coating at birth, our natural desire to mate belly to belly, rather than from behind as all land based animals, save the bonobo, do. There are many, many more aspects that show humans have an aquatic ancestor that I have yet to study in depth, but with just what I have presented, it is plainly obvious that while we DO have a genetic ancestor with primates, we also have a genetic ancestor that has nothing to do with them. This leads us to wonder, if humankind has an aquatic ancestor, what is it and why is there no evidence of it?

2) Human Genetics

To understand what we are, and how we became what we are, we must take a look within our genetic coding. And this is where the fun begins. All animals in the world differ from us in two distinct ways.

Chromosome 2 is a wonderfully controversial issue in the scientific community. In all other animals, chromosome 2 has 2 parts to it, giving the 48 chromosomal strands. Half of these are given from one parent to match with another half from the other parent to make a baby. Thus, all animals in nature, to make a baby, must give 24 of their chromosomes and match them up with 24 other chromosomes to make a healthy baby with 48 chromosomes. Humans do not have 48 chromosomes. We have 46. We are the only animal to have 46 chromosomes. The amazing reason for this is that somewhere in our history our chromosome 2 was fused together. Darwinist scientists say that a great chimpanzee and some unknown great ape mated and this coupling naturally fused the chromosome together. However, if this is naturally occurring, why is it that this has not happened in any other creature we have ever observed? If it cannot be witnessed in any other creature, then Darwinist scientists cannot imperialistically say that our fused chromosome is anything natural. But if it is not natural, that means that something manipulated our genetics thousands of years ago. And, of course, it would not have been humans that did it. Darwinist scientists scoff at this. They want proof that "aliens" genetically manipulated

• << previous page
• 1
• 2
• 3
• ...
• 7
• next page >>

Add your voice

Know something about Do you believe that humanity was created by extraterrestrials??
We want to hear your view. Write now!