There are 10 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #3 by Helium's members.
Three Problems Employers Face When Asking About Past Convictions
Unfortunately, the language employers use on their applications to inquire about an applicant's criminal history often falls into one of three categories: it is either too narrow, too vague, or too ambiguous. This article will discuss each of these three cases and how they can be damaging to one's business:
Too Narrow
An example of a question that is too narrow is to only ask about felonies. Many standard employment applications only ask if an applicant was convicted of a felony. That allows the application form to be used in all states. However, misdemeanors can be very serious. Under California law, for example, most employers would want to know if an applicant had a conviction for offenses such as fighting with a police officer, illegal possession of weapons, spousal abuse or child abuse, commercial burglary, assault and many other offenses. Yet in California and other states, these can all be misdemeanors. Many serious offenses are plea-bargained down to misdemeanor offenses as well. Without the proper language, an applicant can honestly answer that he or she has not been convicted of a felony even though there may be serious misdemeanor convictions an employer needs to know about. A best practice would be to utilize an application form that asks about past criminal conduct in the broadest language allowed by law in your state
Too Broad
On the other hand, some employers ask questions that are so broad that it improperly covers matters that are protected. An example may be, Have you ever committed a crime? Or Have You Ever Been Convicted of Any Crime? There are a number of limitations under state and federal law concerning what an employer may legally ask about or discover concerning an applicant's or employee's criminal record. In fact, it can be a misdemeanor in California for an employer to knowingly violate some of these rules. Furthermore, if an applicant is placed in a position where he is forced to reveal information about himself that he is legally entitled not to disclose, an employer can actually be sued in some states for defamation by compelled self-publication. In other words, if forced to say something defamatory about himself, an applicant may be able to file a lawsuit against the employer for defamation.
Too Ambiguous
The third mistake is to ask an applicant, Have you ever been convicted of a felony or serious misdemeanor? or Have you ever
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
1 - In order for an employer to check out backgrounds or other things on potential candidates, that person must give written
In general, employers are legally permitted to run background checks on job candidates. But there are restrictions under
by Lester Rosen
Three Problems Employers Face When Asking About Past Convictions
Unfortunately, the language employers use on their
by Amy Moshier
I can understand how an employer would want to ensure - at least, to the best of their availability - that they did not hire
I agree with the background checks to a certain degree. For instance, what does someone's credit history have to do with
View All Articles on:
Legality of employers running background checks on job candidates
Add your voice
Know something about Legality of employers running background checks on job candidates?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Gathering of Eagles has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse Gathering of E...more
hide