Channel Button

There is 1 article on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #1 by Helium's members.

Personal Finance   >

Taxes

Get a Widget for this title

Why the federal child tax credit should be done away with

Seldom is the question brought up: Why are those without children expected to contribute a vastly higher percentage of their tax dollars towards K-12 education and child welfare programs than parents themselves?

The federal child tax credit currently gives parents $1000 per child, per year. A single parent making up $75,000 annually, or a married couple making up to $110,000 can collect on this "credit". Often times when the "earned income credit" is also taken, parents will actually receive money from the federal government above and beyond the taxes they paid. This is why I put the child tax "credit" in quotes. When the child tax credit becomes an entitlement, it should no longer be considered a tax credit but rather social welfare.

Public education in America is funded by all citizens, not just parents, and rightfully so. A civilized society can't expect to prosper without holding all responsible for funding quality public education. The problem arises when you look at the brazen inequity of our current system.

While parents take advantage of a generous federal child tax "credit", tax exemptions for dependents, and varying tax perks offered on both a state and federal level (daycare subsidies, tax credits for private education, age based entitlements like state funded health insurance for uninsured children, etc.), those in the working and middle class that don't have children are paying through the nose to fill in the gaps. Why is this alright?

As a general rule, 50% of everyone's property taxes will go to support K-12 education (keep in mind, most everyone pays property taxes either directly via home ownership or indirectly through their monthly rent). A portion of both our state and federal income taxes are also spent on K-12 education. Considering about 4% of the general federal fund is spent on education, some simple math should bring to light a huge injustice.

A single parent with 2 children and a taxable income of $70,000 will receive a $2000 child tax credit. Their federal tax liability will be about $15,000. The child tax credit they claim will discount this liability by 13%. Where is their contribution to the 4% federal education expenditure?

Breaking it down to a state level is difficult due to varying tax rates and state expenditures, so I'll use Oregon (my home state) as an example. In Oregon anyone with a taxable income above $6,501 will pay 9% of it to the state. So the single parent with a taxable income of $70,000 will pay $6,300 for state income


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

Why the federal child tax credit should be done away with

  • 1 of 1

    by Edgar Humphrey

    Seldom is the question brought up: Why are those without children expected to contribute a vastly higher percentage of their

    read more

Add your voice

Know something about Why the federal child tax credit should be done away with?
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

Helium Debate

Cast your vote!

Is long term care insurance really necessary?

Click for your side.

224344

Featured Partner

Society of Professional Journalists

Helium is proud to announce its partnership with the Society of Professional Journalists. Its members (almost 10,000 ...more

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA