by James Bowles

Created on: June 09, 2009   Last Updated: June 15, 2009

Summary: Evolution in the midst of geologic unrest is no more possible than stuffing pea pods with mountain tops. As strange beginnings and unrest is all the world has ever known. In illustration, I will reference the work of Frank D. Stacey (University of Queensland), NASA, and the work of Georges Cuvier (professor, French National Museum of Natural History). These works will demonstrate a world so dynamic and different from the one modernly proposed - that they stare down in disbelief at arguments of the statically configured and slowly drifting continents that evolution theory is so heavily dependent. Hence it cannot be said that evolution of life on earth is a fact substantiated.

Physics of the Earth

"Physics of the Earth," by Frank D. Stacey was published in 1969 (note 1). Therein is the physics and the chemistry for a world that has been largely kept from view. Backed by confirming research, the earth and the moon are described as having been formed together as a double planet (p 39, note 3) by the process of accretion (p 18)

Hence it is that with little exception, we find that the earth and the moon are of the same chemical composition (note 2). Both with water, both with an iron core and magnetic fields (the moon's "past magnetic field" having been discovered from lunar rocks (notes 3 and 4).

As time progressed (following from the conservation of angular momentum), the moon's orbital radius slowly increased (p 37, note 5). This increase is of great scientific interest and it is constantly monitored (in association with NASA) by the University of Texas McDonald Laser Ranging Station using laser stations placed on the moon by Apollo astronauts (note 6)

Angular Momentum and a World in Unrest

Exchanges of angular momentum are never without consequence. In this instance, and in order for the moon's orbital radius to increase, the moon must accelerate and the earth's daily rate of rotation must slow in response. And though the magnitude of the physical reactions within the earth and the moon from these exchanges have never been measured, one still must ask, "How can they be anything but consequential?" Should there be a large and sudden exchange of angular momentum, brought on by earthquake as suggested by NASA, for instances, (notes 7 and 8), the consequence should leave physical evidence. If work hasn't already been done - this needs investigation.

In testimony (though speculative as to cause, but still needing of explanation) there are unexplained

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• Next Page >>