Home > Health & Fitness > Substance Abuse & Addiction > Nicotine Dependence
Created on: June 06, 2009 Last Updated: April 27, 2012
Governments really should ban cigarettes, and there is no real reason why people should be allowed to smoke. There is no health benefit, there is nothing that says that a smoker should be allowed smoke, and there is no amount of smoking that can be considered safe. So why exactly do governments allow smokers to continue such a disgusting habit?
Some people say that smokers have the right to smoke if they chose. Technically it is not illegal to smoke, except for some public areas where people are not allowed to smoke. That is all fine and good, but where does it say in the law that it is a god-given right to smoke a cigarette. All a cigarette will do is kill you, or give you some sort of health ailment that will end up costing everyone in the long run. Health care costs are much higher due to smoking.
However, the tobacco lobby tends to be a tough bunch to crack when it comes to getting rid of them. Tobacco companies have tried everything that they possible could to convince people that cigarettes were not dangerous. Now they try to be more consumer friendly, and even offer smokers ways to quit, despite the fact that they still willingly sell the product for a generous profit.
There is where the real problem lies my friend. If the tobacco industry was thrown out altogether, and cigarettes were made illegal, there would be a shortage of tax revenue. Whenever we need more tax money, we go right to the tobacco companies, and the cigarettes that they make.
Cigarettes are a huge source of not only tax revenue, but a source of profit for those who sell tobacco. It is also a good way to make money to grow tobacco, and other things that you can do with tobacco.
So it really just comes down to the monetary aspect of tobacco. It is hard to get rid of it because of all the money that it brings in, and all the taxes that you can place on it. If it weren't for the money issue, governments would gladly get rid of the cigarettes altogether, if they cared at all about the people that they govern.
Governments should ban smoking, but that it would be too much of a financial burden. If they just eliminated smoking, they would also be crippling the economy. It is too bad that something like a cigarette could hold so much sway over lives, and hold the public hostage. Smoking is not good for anyone.
Learn more about this author, Cody Hodge.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Why don't governments ban smoking altogether?
Stubbing Out Our Civil Liberties
The announcement of a national smoking ban in public places by summer 2007 was the latest
Any government that decided to ban smoking altogether would simply be shooting themselves in the foot. Not only do cigarettes
by Cody Hodge
Governments really should ban cigarettes, and there is no real reason why people should be allowed to smoke. There is no
RJ and the major players of the tobacco industry holds their gains within monopoly inside our government. In N. C., to date,
by Randa Morris
The regulations on cigerette smoking are ludicrous, and to ban it altogether, would be a violation of cigerette smokers
View All Articles on: Why don't governments ban smoking altogether?
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Does our healthcare system do enough for young substance abusers?
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
American Dystonia Society (ADS) is dedicated to advancing Dystonia research, promoting patient advocacy and increasing public awareness of this debilitating disease. Our top priority is to maximize delivery of donations and grants to fun...more