There are 22 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #3 by Helium's members.
have spoken only of the inherent weaknesses of centralised power. In the televised pictures and what those in the industry claim to be exceptional camera work we saw the true beauty of Beijing - very much not a Potemkin village - but that was only because more impoverished buildings were demolished and everything ugly was cleaned up. (But what Olympic venue city has ever showed off its ugly side? Vancouver 2010 will have its own significant challenge, there.) Media people travelled the city and the country, respecting guidelines but otherwise without restriction: because China wanted us to see it. In venues of 91,000 spectators, and another few thousands of athletes and support and staff and volunteers, not a single serious incident happened: and so there was far too permeating a security. Yet if anything violent had occurred, who would have been blamed but the inept security?
Even after the bombing during the opening ceremonies, Atlanta never had this public relations nightmare.
Maybe what we have chosen to forget is that the converse side of free speech is courtesy. When did we start waving around a freedom of speaking as though it ought to come with no restrictions of wisdom and restraint and even simple respect of the other?
The Chinese people were given guidelines how to cheer for opponents: and the result was certainly that every athlete was made to feel honoured, from the moment they first entered the Olympic village to ceremony and the playing of their national anthem. Each of the medal ceremonies was carefully sculpted to give the athletes their moment, and every one of the participants visibly showed pride in having been part of it. Even in the opening ceremony parade of athletes, there was a careful gap between the last of the other nations and the entry of the Chinese athletes: and so again we find that each, even the smallest, was given honour in their moment.
We saw some of the fallout in a cameraderie among the athletes, even the traditional macho posturing of the sprint, such as most of us have never seen. In the men's sprints our media placed the credit upon Usain Bolt; but who gets the credit in all the other events? Who gets the credit in the women's 110 hurdles, where the losers commiserate with the silver medalist for not having won gold, when the one who just discovered she just barely slipped into bronze in a photo finish and the one who just missed it instantly embrace and start jumping up and down in sheer happiness? In two cases
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by Ebey Soman
The 2008 Olympics is a critical step for both the internal image of China as well as how the world precieves China. When
In a perfect world, the quadrennial Olympic Games would stand outside the political sphere - inhabiting a place where citizens
by Tenebris
And so another Olympics comes to a close. There has been celebration and agonising defeat, disappointment and relief - but
Thirty years ago, the prospect of the United States participating in Olympic Games held in Communist China would have been
Why should the West care about Asians running around in robes? Why should the West care about repression in Tibet? Should
View All Articles on:
2008 Olympics: The impact of international politics on the Beijing Olympics
Add your voice
Know something about 2008 Olympics: The impact of international politics on the Beijing Olympics?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
MENTOR - National Mentoring Partnership
MENTOR has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse MENTOR's featured titles, p...more
hide