by Tony El

Created on: May 13, 2009   Last Updated: May 23, 2010

So what if Barack Obama hasn't answered the question of whether he is a true natural born citizen of the United States that qualifies him to the President of the United States? He's articulate, good looking, and he's better the options that were offered to us. Plus he's black, so that cleanses the nation of the guilt of slavery. GW Bush may have committed the worst crime against the American people by fraudulently getting the children of America into a protractive, costly police action in two once sovereign nations, Afghanistan and Iraq, for the benefit of the United Nations. But, he prevented America from being attacked again since September 11 of 2001. As though America was being bombed and assaulted like England during its conflict with Northern Ireland. So that makes everything okay. The ends justify the means. So what. Right?

To even have so many people marginalize the issue of this man who now has his finger of the button of the greatest military arsenal and who has the ability to dramatically shape the social infrastructure and environment of America, as the Commander and Chief of the Armed Forces and head of the Executive Branch of the United States, as to whether he is legally supposed to be in such a position shows how far intellectually this nation has fallen. The voters of the United States treated the election of Obama, and too many of their political elections, too much as though we were voting for the next winner of American Idol by justifying his election so as to give him a chance to see what he can do. Completely overlooking the fact that he had only been a U.S Senator for barely 2 years, with a virtually unknown history of accomplishments in anything of substance. The voters required less experience of Obama to be President then they would a registered nurse with nice legs and tits with a great smile and silk sultry voice seeking to care for our mom.

How can he be illegitimate? He was properly sworn in right? Was he? The oath was not properly administered; remember the Supreme Court Justice inexplicably fumbled the oath. This the most important task of the Justice, it only happens ever four years, on the same day and month exactly, and he wasn't prepared? So, should it not be wise for the citizens to question every ruling that he presided over to see if he may have fumbled any other crucial event? But, everything is okay because he later administered the oath behind close doors, in the present of a very select few witnesses. Com'on this

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next Page >>