September 28, 2001 and is the cornerstone of the United Nations counterterrorism effort. It declares international terrorism as a threat to international peace and security. One of the most important aspects of Resolution 1373 was the creation of the Counter-Terrorism Committee. The Counter-Terrorism Committee has a unique role in the fight on terror and is most assuredly at the center of the fight. The Resolution also strives to suppress the financing of terrorism and abolish any potential safe havens for terrorists.
Resolution 1373 is an ambitious step in combating terrorism and has shown promise. Nesi writes, "In the four years after 9/11 it has adopted almost twenty resolutions on the topic: some of these resolutions were immediate reactions by the Security Council to specific terrorist attacks; others framed a coordinated international response to terrorism in a substantive way" (p. 1).
After World War II, the Security Council was given the power to maintain international peace and security. Instead they have decided to make, implement, and enforce global law and have overstepped its traditional crisis management role. The United Nations is to concerned with human rights, which hasn't been the most effective strategy. They have taken war and tried to establish strict directives and laws, which in a sense has crippled the United States Armed Forces.
War is in essence an unjust and barbarous necessity in the world.
Ever since the dawn of man, we have been plagued with overwhelming emotions, to include a strong desire to stay alive. War equals fear, but with the Laws of Armed Conflict that the United Nations enforces the men fighting in these wars are supposed to be devoid of emotion, especially fear. The soldiers over in Iraq are expected to be a police force but actually have more strict laws. If a terrorist points a gun directly at a soldier according to these Laws of Armed Conflict he is unable to fire until he is fired upon or sees the muzzle flash. If this were a police officer he would have put the enemy down the second he attempted to raise his gun. To expect a soldier to stand there and wait to die is absurd and only one reason why the United Nations has no place within a war zone.
The overseeing of armed conflicts has increased the probability that we will fail in the War On Terror. Lets take a look at the history to add some substance to this.
During the American Revolutionary War it was custom to stand in straight lines and fight face-to-face with
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by Aamir Saleem
The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, were acts of war against the United States, peaceful people throughout the
by Trav McGee
Something that is not understood in many parts of America is the fact that America is at war. We are dealing with forces
The so-called "War on Terror" is not winnable in a conventional sense, because it is not a conventional war. Making such
Winning the war on terrorism can be accomplished by military, civilian, and idealistic preparations. Military occupation
In order to win the war against Al Qaeda, the US must have clearly defined military missions and clearly defined plans to
View All Articles on:
Winning the war against terrorism
Add your voice
Know something about Winning the war against terrorism?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
The Project on Government Oversight (POGO)
The Project On Government Oversight (POGO) is an independent nonprofit that investigates and exposes corruption and o...more
hide