There are 9 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #1 by Helium's members.
Title endorsed in part by:
Results so far:
| Yes | 42% | 41 votes | Total: 97 votes | |
| No | 58% | 56 votes |
Energy subsidizes of any kind to any industry, whether oil, coal, wind or solar, are simply transfers of wealth from the pockets of the working citizens to Resource and Energy Corporations. They serve no practical purpose other than bolstering the bottom lines of these companies and interfering with consumer choice.
The entire United States electrical system is a study in subsidy and market intervention. For the most part, all large power plant projects, including dams and nuclear plants, have been either directly paid for and built by the Federal Government often through the Army Corp of Engineers, or been highly subsidized. The electrical grid system, the fairly inefficient collection of nationwide power lines that transfer electrical power from centralized power plants to far away cities and towns, was constructed by the Government.
Once knowledge about electricity became commonplace, it was only a matter of time until people would "demand" that they were able to utilize this wonderful product. But, this in no way predetermines that bringing electricity to the citizen couldn't have been accomplished much more efficiently through the "free market". In fact, if done in that manner, we would be eons ahead of the situation we find ourselves in today; burdened with a fundamentally flawed and energy wasting system. A true market would only compensate efficiency and low cost, not inefficiency and the seemingly unlimited finances of the taxpayer.
Electricity is at its best when it is produced and consumed in relatively close distances. Our grid system utilizes huge power plants, planted many miles from the destination of the power. It is then transported at extremely high voltage over a very expensive but insufficient web of wires to its distant goal; homes and businesses. The further electricity travels, the more waste occurs as heat because of the inherent friction known as resistance. It is estimated that up to one third of the original electrical power is wasted before it gets to its final destination.
These large subsidized power plants are also very inefficient and waste up to half of the fuel consumed. This is primarily due to the fact that when Government enters the market, they have no need to compete. They cannot experience insolvency because of a bad or inefficient decision. Well, at least not yet! So, using taxpayer funds responsibly and competitively is not a concern.
Subsidies to all the Resource Energy Corporations, those that market our coal, oil, gas,
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by Gene Denardo
Energy subsidizes of any kind to any industry, whether oil, coal, wind or solar, are simply transfers of wealth from the
The government should stop all subsidies to energy consumption, and if it still wants to spend, should fund alternative energy
The short answer to the question of whether the government should stop providing subsidies to all energy sources is no. Rather,
by Skye Martin
Government subsidies to energy sources in the U.S. has long been over influenced or outright controlled by business and led
Add your voice
Know something about Should the government stop providing subsidies to all energy sources, eg, coal, oil, solar and wind??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Featured Partner
Society of Professional Journalists
Helium is proud to announce its partnership with the Society of Professional Journalists. Its members (almost 10,000 ...more
hide