3 of 5

Yes

Write now Article Tools

The money of politics has gone wild! We have become a nation where the politician who draws the biggest bucks wins the prize: an elected office. What's wrong with this scenario? The most moneyed candidate often does not equal the best candidate. The power of money often distorts the political process and the political process integrity.

More Money = More Qualified?

Even though many people buy into the lie, the lie does not become truth in reality. Money does not, should not, equal the best candidate for the job. More money, less money, no money at all, money has nothing to do with qualifications for political office. At least this is true in a world where politicians are chosen based on what they can or cannot do for their constituents rather than how easily money mongers can buy them.

Level the field = Less Bias?

In order to level the playing field for all, we must put policies in place that cap the amount of money we allow a candidate to spend for "politicking" or running for office. First, that money can find a much better use elsewhere. Second, in a truly democratic society, everyone should stand a chance regardless of their financial ability to pay to play. The person who raises the most money can pay to slant the message of his or her own politics and often the message of his or her opponents as well. This leads to an election based on propaganda.

Money = Power = Corruption?

We all know that power has a tendency to corrupt. In our world, money equals power. Unfortunately, those that pay often want the politician to pay later by providing favors. The rare politician might withstand the pressure, but most know that real money is seldom given without strings attached. The candidate who can raise the most money, becomes the candidate who owes the most favors. This sets the system up for bias from the start.

Let's face it, those who want to fund-raise outside their own district or state want the money advantage expanding their funding base provides. Setting limits on that funding base just makes sense, especially in light of the abuse we see so often. Outside funding, by its very nature sets the system up for bias. After all, outside money does not benefit the givers, so what do they expect in return?

Eliminating outside funding may not totally level the playing field or eliminate bias, but it cuts the chances and helps insure the aspiring politician will look to the benefit of those who live within the district or state because they must entice them to help fund the campaign by showing they are the best person for the job. What a novel concept!

Learn more about this author, Angela S. Young.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

Add your voice

Know something about Should members of Congress be prohibited from raising money from people outside of their district or state??
We want to hear your view. Write now!