There are 15 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #3 by Helium's members.
I read Brandon Caylor's article, and while I respect their view on file-sharing, I have to point out that bands like Metallica (which is a phenomenal talent) are somehow reduced by having their music freely available. I saw them in concert, and would absolutely expect to pay for their music. People go out specifically to buy their CD's and other merchandise - and then the band's exhaustive efforts are rewarded. There are always going to be people copying their friends tapes/CD's, and some merchandise will sell underground - however, having music available for free on such a large scale as it was on napster, for instance, is not such a great thing for famous names - whereas, for an up-and-coming band that needs to get their music out there, is something of a different story. Imagine if everyone could get 'New York Time's' best seller books for free.
Learn more about this author, C. Penlington.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by Mark de Jong
Grand Theft Audio
Is the age of digital music going to single-handedly topple the music industry? Should art be free? Is
As a current full time musician (meaning I have no other source of income aside from music), I believe I offer a valid perspective.
I read Brandon Caylor's article, and while I respect their view on file-sharing, I have to point out that bands like Metallica
by John Durant
You roll out of bed every workday morning, take a hot shower, get dressed, chomp into some fruity-nutty breakfast bar, and
I have another perspective on this issue of music file-sharing from an artist's perspective. I am a writer. I write songs,
View All Articles on:
Music file-sharing: An artist's perspective
Add your voice
Know something about Music file-sharing: An artist's perspective?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
hide