Plot- A letter from an old flame lures Cop Edward Malus (Nicholas Cage) to Summerisle, to investigate the disappearance of a missing girl. Malus finds the island community unwilling to cooperate with his enquiries and suspects the girl is going to be scarified. As he races against time to save her, he becomes perilously entangled in the island's secretive world of rituals and deceit.
Remakes are always going to be compared with the original, and only work successfully if the first effort is largely forgotten by the public consciousness. The primary difficulty with this film is that it is a remake of Robin Hardy's 1973 cult British horror, so the films climatic finale comes as no surprise to most. Ellen Burstyn's portrayal as Sister Summerisle does not stand up against Christopher Lee's memorable performance in the original, and the same can be said of Cage's OTT performance when pitted against Edward Woodward.
This film follows the basic plot outline of the first, but the filmmakers have attempted to add a few new twists, turning the missing girl into a love child Malus hadn't known existed. However, we still don't sympathise enough with Malus for this film to work and find. They've also tried to give Malus a personal attachment to the island, by creating a back story with Willow (the missing girl's mother), but this relationship also fails to be convincing.
The fertility obsessed pagan community of the first film has been replaced by a matriarchal beekeeping pagan community, and Malus just so happens to be allergic, a coincidence which adds little to the films plot. They even throw in an elderly set of identical twins, which happen to speak in unison and have two good eyes between them; which serves as a good example of how in this instance the communities weirdness is simply annoying and clich. The changes in the plot seem ill thought out, and the overall film lacks the rawness that originally made Woodward's plight and sacrifice so haunting. This film fails to engage, let alone sustain suspense or scare us (MPAA rating PG-13, says it all), and we can barely wait for Malus' sacrifice to begin so ours can end.
Verdict- There was no need for this film to be made, and watching is nothing more than a bad waste of time. 1/5
Learn more about this author, Giovanni Ferri.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Looking for some otherworldly thrills? This remake of the 1973 movie The Wicker Man may be just what you're looking for.
Edward
by Donald Lind
Wicker Man' is just plain bad
The horror movie genre regularly devours its older films and regurgitates them as new several
I'm a big fan of the 73 version of The Wicker Man; so much so I have every release of the movie on DVD or Video in the UK
by Kevin Powers
Let me just start off by saying that I am not a fan of the original British version of the film with Christopher Lee. I
Plot- A letter from an old flame lures Cop Edward Malus (Nicholas Cage) to Summerisle, to investigate the disappearance
View All Articles on:
Movie reviews: The Wicker Man (2006)
Add your voice
Know something about Movie reviews: The Wicker Man (2006)?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Time 4A Change (T4AC) is committed to educating citizens about social issues and mobilizing those citizens as partici...more
hide