Home > Politics, News & Issues > International Politics > War & Terrorism
Created on: April 03, 2009 Last Updated: April 08, 2009
Surgified Iraq:
How the US has guaranteed a state of chaos for years to come
In recent months, the world has been hearing more and more about a sharp increase of vendetta style torture and killing by the current Iraqi government against those leaders of Sunni tribes who were partners with the US during the infamous surge of 2007 and 2008, namely the Sons of Iraq aka, the Awakening Councils. Prior to the official launching of President Bush's surge in early 2007, a deal was secretly worked out between the US military, headed by General Patraeus, and the Awakening Councils which were comprised of many small Sunni tribes. The plan promised these tribes would be handsomely paid if they drastically reduced their violence overall and stopped targeting US troops. In effect, this is nothing more than a modern version of "You scratch my back and I'll scratch yours". In large part because of this, Bush's surge was hailed as a military victory of immense proportions.
This wasn't the first time the US military used lots of money to influence major leaders in Iraq to stop attacking American forces. Before the war even started US dollars were being lavishly thrown at key elements in the Iraqi military to do the very same thing. On Saturday, May 24, 2003, the Independent news media out of the UK published an article entitled, "US army chief says Iraqi troops took bribes to surrender".
The article describes how these Senior Iraqi military officers "of key Iraqi cities were bribed not to fight by American special forces." It then went on to say, "General Tommy Franks, the US army commander for the war, said these Iraqi officers had acknowledged their loyalties were no longer with the Iraqi leader, Saddam Hussein, but with their American paymasters. As a result, many officers chose not to defend their positions as American and British forces pushed north from Kuwait. I had letters from Iraqi generals saying: 'I now work for you', General Franks said."[1]
This tactic worked to perfection. During the invasion portion of the war, Coalition forces encountered very little if any hostility in town after town. One can only guess at the number of Coalition and Iraqi lives this plan saved. Within a month American and allied troops had reached Baghdad. Who can forget the infamous video of a lone American tank touring the empty streets of the capital, on April 9, 2003, and finding no resistance, thus signaling the actual end to hostilities?
At that point of the war, many people around the world
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Has America gone too far with anti-terrorism?
by Nancy Houser
"The 1988 U.S. letter clearly states that the United States has the right to use its elements ... for national security
If the dramatic events of September 11th, 2001 had never taken place, most probably, we would not be having this discussion.
You "fight fire with fire", so the most incorrigible terrorists can only be stopped forcibly, but America must do better
The question; "Has America gone too far with Anti-Terrorism?" The answer depends upon time and perspective. If the question
by Sheria Reid
A good friend likes to give me riddles to which he doesn't know the answer. Recognizing my compulsive personality disorder,
View All Articles on: Has America gone too far with anti-terrorism?
Featured Partner
Presidential Climate Action Project (PCAP)
The Presidential Climate Action Project (PCAP) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse PCAP's featured titles, pick an issue and write! You can also donate your article earnings. Share...more