by Barbara Whitlock

Created on: March 20, 2009   Last Updated: July 10, 2009

Those who love the English language often groan when others butcher or re-create the language. But one must also realize that language evolves over time. This article provides evidence to demonstrate that language evolves necessarily, and those who pull against changes play a valuable balancing role, but may not win in the long run.

When talking about modern word-use issues, I weep occasionally for words I miss like "whom" and other endangered linguistic species. And yet, I remember that language exists within a cultural dialectic between rules and practice. Fact: Language changes over time. Fiction: There are language rules that transcend time.

A new twist on an old joke: Would you rather talk to a linguist or a terrorist? Answer: A terrorist - at least he'll negotiate.

Seriously though, rather than decry declining standards in language, it helps to shift the focus. We are not simply suffering a free-fall on standards; we're in a shifting pattern, which always ascends. The English language continues to grow in neologisms (new word uses and expressions).

New words join the language daily. Dictionary-makers expand their books frequently. Some estimate that, over the 20th century, 25% new words were added to the English language. Add the Information Revolution and tech-speak additions, and we may see a rocket-blast climb in new words for the 21st century.

For example, despite the fact that Google remains a prosperous company (read: monopoly), they do not want to become a verb. However, "to google" a search query is so common I'm doubtful Google, the proper noun, will mount an effective resistance.

Language changes take place within a larger cultural context. Norman Cohen outlined the pattern which Scientific Revolutions follow: A belief matrix holds dominance for a period of time. Doubters are marginalized, until the number of doubters outweighs those holding to older beliefs. A paradigm shift moves the center to a new resting place.

Likewise, language changes and rules shift. A healthy dialectic ensures we move slowly in this change pattern, with rule-abiding forces providing healthy resistance against the rule-breakers.

I join in sympathetic longing for that glorious past, where thoughtful language rules ensured gracious restraint for common tongues. But the press of time and cultural change is ever upon us.

Learn more about this author, Barbara Whitlock.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.