There are 4 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #2 by Helium's members.
The one word to describe fusion as an energy source is "uncertain." Scientists and engineers have been trying for controlled, earth-bound fusion for over 50 years. The primary result has been frustration. In fact there is a saying that "fusion is the energy source of the future - and always will be." I'm not quite that pessimistic, but I do realize that the difficulties are serious.
To understand those difficulties it is useful first to understand what fusion is in terms of its potential for energy. Simply put, fusion is the merger of two atomic nuclei to form one heavier nucleus, or two different nuclei (more on the latter below). The most common fusion would be what takes place in the sun with hydrogen nuclei being fused into helium nuclei. Hydrogen comes in three forms, regular hydrogen with one proton in the nucleus, deuterium with a proton and a neutron, and tritium with a proton and two neutrons.
The difficulty of fusing two hydrogen nuclei comes from the fact that we have to get the nuclei very close together before they fuse. All nuclei contain protons which are positively charged and positive charges repel each other. Even worse, the closer together they get the stronger that repulsive force becomes. With one exception (treated below), we have to heat those atoms up to a tremendous temperature before they can get close enough to merge. They have to be so hot that the electrons are all stripped off, leaving a mixture of negative electrons and positive nuclei called a plasma. This is so hot that no material can withstand the heat. You can't make a container to hold gas that hot because it would vaporize the container (if it didn't cool the plasma first). The sun solves this problem by being huge and having enough gravity to hold its hydrogen together. It's rather difficult to do that on earth so we have to find other ways to contain this stuff long enough to allow it to fuse. There are two promising ways to do this, plus one way to kind of do an end run around the problem.
The first way to contain the plasma is by magnetic confinement. Since the electrons and nuclei are electrically charged a magnetic field will turn them. The idea is to turn them away from the boundary of the "magnetic bottle," confining them so they can have a fusion reaction. This has been achieved, but only very briefly and so far we cannot get out as much energy as it takes to do it. The problem is that the magnetic "bottles" tend to develop places where the plasma can leak out. Since
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Nuclear Fusion Research Must be funded by the U.S. Government
Imagine a man-made sun. That's fusion. It is a wonderful concept
The one word to describe fusion as an energy source is "uncertain." Scientists and engineers have been trying for controlled,
by Rick Badman
When I designed a fission/fusion reactor in 1977, I thought for sure we would have fusion power by the end of the 20th century.
After the development of Nuclear Fission reactors that now lay scattered amongst the nuclear nations across the globe, the
Add your voice
Know something about The future of fusion as an alternative energy source?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Featured Partner
Chesapeake Service Systems (CSS) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse C...more
hide