Home > Sports & Recreation > Sports & Recreation (Other)
Created on: March 14, 2009 Last Updated: March 20, 2009
Cricket was a dying sport, losing it's fan base to long drawn out test matches and 50 over battle in which neither side was sure whether to offend or defend. T20 has revitalised the sport, drawn in fans and brought more money to the game then ever. Just look at the average tickets sold for a T20 game compared to a test. It remains that most international tests in England are sold out, but county T20 is filling up too!
T20 has the pace, the vigour and the sheer thrill to be massively successful and bring cricket into the 21st century, however it is remorseful the conduct of the likes of Sir Alan Stanford and the funding behind the IPL. Extravagant amounts of money is just not cricket. That's football. The last thing any real cricket fan will want is for T20 cricket to become like the Premiership football league. We don't need Roman Abromovich's millions or 100 million pound transfer deals.
In one respect T20 cricket is new, exciting and the future of the sport; in another it is risky, over commercialised and possibly the downfall of the game's credibility. There is a saying I've already used in this article. "That's just not cricket". That saying originates from the laws of cricket, not the rules, they are laws. Umpires are the highest authority on that pitch and they enforce them as laws. There is no arguing, there are no disputes and pressuring the umpires like footballers do with referees. This is because in football the winning team usually earns several million more. Winning the league earns the club hundreds of millions and the players see some of this. In cricket the sport itself means more then the money.
We even saw it in the Sir Alan Stanford million dollar match, where each player from the winning team would walk away with a cool $1 million. Conduct was appalling. Not noticeable to the untrained eye, but down there on that pitch was subtle, and not so subtle, pressuring. There were disputes, because all of a sudden that poor decision by the umpire that gave your teammate out was worth $1 million.
So embrace twenty over cricket, it's fun and it's new and it's revitalising the sport of cricket, but be wary, for it's over commercialisation may just destroy the fabric of the game that makes it unique and separate from the others. It is as much the duty of the fan to uphold the old laws then of the players on the pitch, the coaches and the ICC. Now that's cricket.
Learn more about this author, Michael King.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Is the new 'Twenty20' cricket version a curse or a boon?
It is no surprise to see the old chestnuts being trotted-out as soon as any discussion begins on the merits, or otherwise,
by Michael King
Cricket was a dying sport, losing it's fan base to long drawn out test matches and 50 over battle in which neither side
The future of cricket as a TRUE world sport lies in 20/20 cricket. At the moment there are 10 test playing nations and Zimbabwe's
by C.V.Rajan
TWENTY2O IS OUT ; DOZEN-12 IS IN!
Change is the essence of life. When 50-over One Day International (ODI) Cricket was introduced
The Twenty20 format is a new revolution to hit the cricket scene. I suppose it can be seen from a variety of perspectives;
View All Articles on: Is the new 'Twenty20' cricket version a curse or a boon?
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Indian cricket: Is Sachin Tendulkar a 'batting allrounder'?
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
LEAP has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse LEAP's featured titles, pick an issue and write! You can also donate your article earnings. Share what you know, learn new perspectives and don...more