Home > Arts & Humanities > Philosophy > Philosophical Concepts
Results so far:
| Big Bang | 54% | 1235 votes | Total: 2291 votes | |
| Big Man | 46% | 1056 votes |
Created on: March 08, 2009 Last Updated: March 10, 2009
Let us begin by naming our "Big Man" something that most of the religions may understand to, such as: our "Creator," instead. We should come to believe that life, always will be created by life. The last written sentence provides evidence that our "Creator" then must be of life or as most of us come to believe, greater than such. We mustn't get confused with the Big Bang Theory, which may have made up our galaxies and elements, but certainly couldn't of created living organisms.
As stated in other articles, "Big Man" is a name of which should not be categorized with God or a Higher Power. The reason for this being that the whole purpose for religion is to believe in something greater than man. Although a "Big" man is of greater physical components more than the norm, this does not mean that a big or larger man has created or made us. What we must realize is that (if you have a religion) we worship our Creator because He is believed to have everything beyond any of our mankind.
The life process should be considered as being produced by having to do so through itself. Without life, there is none, therefore dead and nonorganic objects cannot result from this. If we know that life has to be created by life then we, as living organisms, must have been produced in the start of our evolution by a Creator of some sort. This Creator, which may have phenomenally created us as beings, is what we call our God(s) today. Note that we might use the word, "may," at times because everything pertaining to this topic is in theory (not proven).
Although some theories such as the Big Bang is scientifically appeasing, we must not stray from the thought that a Creator could have done the same, as He could be incredibly more advanced than we ever will become. We must not judge poorly on the 'Bang Theory only because it is still a very plausabible guess on how non-organic matter could of actually been created in the first place. As this is an amazing way to explain how galaxies and stars may have formed, we should still humbly agree that any life form could not be created by this "colliding of atoms theory."
In my opinion, admitting I do not practice religion as much as I should, there must be a reason that we all live and die. It is a fact that no human being, even the most intelligent person, has ever known the true reason why all life produces, reproduces, and then dies. I believe that we couldn't of evolved by knowing that some studies show micro-organisms would have evolved backwards (smaller). Because of many factors I come to believe that there is a reason I am here on Earth, and that reason will only lie in my will to live and undoubtedly within the "Big Man," whom I call my Creator.
Learn more about this author, Anthony Miele.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Big Bang or Big Man: How in the heck did we get here?
Big Man
Big Bang
View all articles on: Big Bang or Big Man: How in the heck did we get here?
Featured Partner
Breakthrough India has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse Breakthrough's featured titles, pick an issue and write! You can also donate your article earnings. Share what you know, lear...more