It will always be a wonder to me how so many people believe that the evolution theory is something science has proven. Yet the fact is it has not been proven, that is why it is still a theory. Even the evolutionary scientist will admit this. What the average person doesnt understand is that the natural changes that every creature goes through to become accustomed to the changes in its surroundings is not true evolution. Neither evolutionary science nor christians argue against this. True evolution is the changing of one animal to another. As in the theory of man coming from ape. There is no proof of any one extinct creature or non extinct creature changing to another creature. This does not include standard metomorphisis as in the cattepillar turning into the butterfly and such. That does not go into the books as evolution. Even the charts we find of different apes showing the changes up until they are standing up are not proven. For the first and most common problem with them they are still missing that one link. Secondly there is a theory that the cranium continues to grow as we live. the older we get the larger our forehead gets. Creation scientists have shown that if a person was to live to be two or three hundred years old that the skull would look to be exactly like that of the cromagnum man. "But nobody lives to be two hundred years!" The bible actually talks about people in the old testiment who lived to be two to three hundred years old in those days. Whether you believe in the bible or not, what one has to admit is that this logic is just as much proof for the christian belief that the ape to man links are to evolution. I am not trying to convince anyone that christianity is right here but that simply there is proof for both theories, not just one.
Yet there is proof that true evolution is wrong but the evolutionary scientist dont want to accept it. The Inca's who lived (500 AD - 1500 AD) used burial stones that looked like large stone eggs. They have found these with pictures carved into them. The first skeleton of a dinosaur was not put together until long after that. So without the skeleton of a dinosaur to show them what they looked like, how could the Inca's have drawn such accurate pictures without seeing them? Yet the Incas were only thousands of years ago and dinosaurs were suppose to go extinct about 65 million years ago. To show that I am not just making this stuff up you can go to the following site to see pictures and such of these stones. http://www.omniology.com/IcaPeruDinoArt.html
An archeologist in 1945, Waldemar Julsrud, found statues of dinosaurs. These figurines were dated back to the period of 800 BC to 200 AD. Again, the first skeleton of a dinosaur had not been put together yet. Nobody knew what these dinosaurs actually looked like until the skeletons were assembled. So how could these small statues be created to look like them if the creator had never seen one?
http://www.bible.ca/tracks/tracks-acambaro.htm
Th e reason evolutionary scientist have not and will not accept these facts is because they would prove that everything they have worked all of their lives to prove is false. Evolutionary scientists have even admitted that if Dinosaurs are ever proven to have lived thousands of years ago, that it would destroy their theories about evolution. And if you are wondering about how carbon dating has shown dinosaurs to live millions of years ago, the fact is carbon dating does not work. Creation scientists have taken things that they knew for a fact were only hundreds of years old and have gotten the readings back at millions of years. Carbon dating actually is very very unreliable, but evolutionary scientist will stand by it simply because it backs up what they believe.
The fact is this world teaches what it wants the people to know rather than the whole truth. Our schools and our government are of a secular nature and not just nuetral to the Christian views but against them. There is as much proof for the Cration beliefs as there is for Evolution beliefs. Neither is proven and both have evidence of their theories. Yet our government and our schools only teach one side of it when both sides should be taught so that we can make our own minds up as to what to believe.
If one believes the schools teach the truth, all they have to do is ask their kids and probably themselves who discovered America. The answer will almost always come back Christopher Columbus. Yet the truth is he did not truly discover it first. The explorer Amerigo Vespucci found the main land first and therefore the continent was named after him. Columbus actually found the Florida keys first and didnt find the main land until his second trip. Amerigo had even written letters about the land and its habbitants while Columbus still thought he was in Asia. Yet the schools fail to teach our kids this. There are so many things the schools dont teach our kids and only teach them the things they want us to learn. Many who read this might call me a Conspiracy Theorist, but I have laid out facts and given sites to back them up. If there is actual proof that Dinosaurs still walked the earth only thousands of years ago, (and there is) why doesnt our schools teach those theories as well? Because it would create a conflict in what the world already has accepted. Look at he sites I have given you. Dig into these things yourself. I am not just given my thoughts on the ideas. I am offering evidence if you are willing to look at it.