by Kenneth Schonmeier

Created on: January 26, 2007   Last Updated: May 21, 2008

It will always be a wonder to me how so many people believe that the evolution theory is something science has proven. Yet the fact is it has not been proven, that is why it is still a theory. Even the evolutionary scientist will admit this. What the average person doesnt understand is that the natural changes that every creature goes through to become accustomed to the changes in its surroundings is not true evolution. Neither evolutionary science nor christians argue against this. True evolution is the changing of one animal to another. As in the theory of man coming from ape. There is no proof of any one extinct creature or non extinct creature changing to another creature. This does not include standard metomorphisis as in the cattepillar turning into the butterfly and such. That does not go into the books as evolution. Even the charts we find of different apes showing the changes up until they are standing up are not proven. For the first and most common problem with them they are still missing that one link. Secondly there is a theory that the cranium continues to grow as we live. the older we get the larger our forehead gets. Creation scientists have shown that if a person was to live to be two or three hundred years old that the skull would look to be exactly like that of the cromagnum man. "But nobody lives to be two hundred years!" The bible actually talks about people in the old testiment who lived to be two to three hundred years old in those days. Whether you believe in the bible or not, what one has to admit is that this logic is just as much proof for the christian belief that the ape to man links are to evolution. I am not trying to convince anyone that christianity is right here but that simply there is proof for both theories, not just one.

Yet there is proof that true evolution is wrong but the evolutionary scientist dont want to accept it. The Inca's who lived (500 AD - 1500 AD) used burial stones that looked like large stone eggs. They have found these with pictures carved into them. The first skeleton of a dinosaur was not put together until long after that. So without the skeleton of a dinosaur to show them what they looked like, how could the Inca's have drawn such accurate pictures without seeing them? Yet the Incas were only thousands of years ago and dinosaurs were suppose to go extinct about 65 million years ago. To show that I am not just making this stuff up you can go to the following site to see pictures and such of these stones.

• 1
• 2
• Next Page >>