9 of 27

Write now Article Tools

Since I often write about what is called the intercardinal axial compass stretching from southwest to northeast and from northwest to southeast on a crossed diagonal basis of inter-class and inter-gender polarity, I may as well add some new thoughts to the corpus of axis-inspired ideas which enable one to distinguish church-hegemonic/state-subordi nate (southwest to northeast) from state-hegemonic/church-subordi nate (northwest to southeast) axial criteria.

What I am especially interested in establishing is that neither axis is corrupt although the state-hegemonic/church-subordi nate one is the secular fruit of schismatic heresy and is therefore open to allegations of religious corruption and that both axes are corrupt, though not, assuredly, in the same way.

In fact, they are corrupt and not corrupt in opposite ways the state-hegemonic/church-subordi nate axis in terms of male corruption in relation to an overall female dominance, and the church-hegemonic/state-subordi nate one in terms of female corruption in relation to an overall male dominance.

But there are two ways of being corrupt, as of course of not being corrupt, and we can define them as absolute and relative, corresponding to noumenal and phenomenal, ethereal and corporeal axial polarities.

Let us take the state-hegemonic/church-subordi nate axis first, where male corruption is absolute in pseudo-metaphysics (from out of antimetaphysics) under the female unequivocal hegemony of metachemistry at the northwest point of the intercardinal axial compass, and relative in physics over the female subordination of pseudo-chemistry (from out of antichemistry) at the southeast point of the said compass, the former order of corruption implying free soma and bound psyche under metachemical pressure and the latter bound-somatic emphasis at the expense of free psyche in relation to pseudo-chemical subversion at the behest of the overall axial dominance of metachemistry - metachemistry and pseudo-chemistry constitutive of primary state-hegemonic/church-subordi nate axial criteria, pseudo-metaphysics and physics their secondary state-hegemonic/church-subordi nate counterparts.

Thus male corruption is absolute in pseudo-metaphysics and relative in physics, females not corrupted (uncorrupted) in metachemistry where, being unequivocally hegemonic, they are free to be absolutely true to their selves free soma and bound psyche existing on a three-to-one-basis of mother-to-daughter-like state/church relativity, and only partially

• 1
• 2
• 3
• next page >>

Add your voice

Know something about Why moral relativism is wrong?
We want to hear your view. Write now!