Home > Health & Fitness > Diets > Diet & Weight Loss
Created on: February 13, 2009 Last Updated: March 03, 2009
Every now and then I watch the Biggest Loser. When the new season started, in January, I, reluctantly, had it programmed into my DVR.
I say reluctantly because I have mixed feelings about that show.
On the one hand it's interesting and inspiring to see people, who are so severely obese, lose weight. Especially since I have to admit to myself that, at 253 I'd be a lightweight, but I could still be a contestant on the show.
On the other, it's unrealistic and more than a little fake.
Don't get me wrong, these people are losing the weight, and they're working VERY hard to do it. There is absolutely nothing fake about that. But it's how they're losing the weight that's unrealistic and fake. And I have a big problem with the way they measure progress.
There's more to weight and weight loss than mere pounds. There's body composition. What are those pounds made of?
And the problem I have with the way the Biggest Loser measures weight loss is that you can't tell if the pounds are water, fat, muscle or bone. And it does matter. Some of these people are losing weight in the double digits each week. I see so many of these people lose so much weight yet, they don't look any different. They don't look any smaller (or healthier) until several weeks in. And you think, well, they originally weighed over 300lbs, they're not going to look thinner right away. Fine, I'll concede that someone so large will need to lose A LOT of weight for it to be noticeable. But I've lost 20 lbs before (just not in a week) and there has been a noticeable difference. I don't see it so much in these people.
But the other issue I have with the measuring system is that it's not fair. A loss of pounds does not mean a FAT loss. And a gain of pounds doesn't mean a FAT gain. As a matter of fact, the first time I was successful in losing weigh I got down to 179 (from 220) but I dropped from a size 20 to a 12/14. And the LAST time I was a 14 I weighed less than 179. That means I had more muscle mass than the last time I was that size and less fat. And if you gain muscle your POUND losses are going to be small and slow because you're replacing the fat weight with muscle weight.
So a Loser who gains muscle easily is at a disadvantage because their pound losses are going to be smaller, even if their actual fat loss may be higher.
Which gets me to the issue of how they lose weight.
On the surface it's a sound plan: Diet and exercise. But there have been reports that the diet isn't necessarily as healthy as wew are led
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Biggest Loser recipes for weight loss
NBC's prime time hit The Biggest Loser, a diet-survivor reality game show, promotes healthy eating and exercise as the recipe
by Jill Jackson
Every now and then I watch the Biggest Loser. When the new season started, in January, I, reluctantly, had it programmed
by Kat Scheller
The magic diet. The magic pill. The magic exercise regimen. Millions of people search daily for "the" answer to their weight
Featured Partner
Why Tuesday has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse Why Tuesday's featured titles, pick an issue and write! You can also learn new perspectives on issues that you care about.more