by Gary C. Gibson

Created on: January 26, 2009   Last Updated: July 04, 2009

In the beginning one singularity possibly of zero dimensions issued relations of structure that provide an appearance of matter and anti-matter integrally expanding with space-time through temporal phases of thermodynamic order. One wonders if a philosophical idea could ever be anything completely independent of the physical history of the Universe,and if it could would it have meaning? Though a zero-dimensional state is a logical possibility of nearly infinitely compacted mass/energy in a singularity-if spirit originated the ball of yarn that is the Universe-a yo yo cosmos with a word of data formation content to begin knocking the stable singularity like a croquet mallet hitting a croquet ball through the sticky wicket of a zero dimensional state into hyper-inflation, can some kind of a spiritual and philosophical insight transcend the physic's field that comprises the dimensional extension of mass-energy? Should philosophy even want to venture in to such concerns when the Spirit of God is the most likely avenue for a central, transcending truth with Jesus Christ-God pre-inflationary status for the eternal?

Philosophers and physicists seek after the one; the original singular reality before its expansion into a variety of forms like a great tree in which all the birds of a universe may dwell to twitter. God is the One to who all humanity must renormalize and reconcile from the fallen, less than perfect relationship as levels of structure in matter themselves. A temporal evolution of matter that has given rise to spiritual self-awareness must ascend to know the One through the Son Jesus Christ. A perfect, eternal, infinite, omniscient author of all ideas that are actualized from eternity has let a few become an evolution of changing intervals in matter, space and time. An abbreviated, variegated structure downloaded as a progression from eternity is a mysterious and beautiful thing-a truth philosophers and physicists seek to comprehend.

A central truth for philosophy might be considered to be a maximum truth-a truth for which their is no greater. The topic of interest for this inquiry; is there a central truth in philosophy, as there may be a unifying theory in physics is quite a large concept. Each predicate of a proposition might be structured in the abstract for a start. Is a CT for Phi like a CT for Phy. Alternatively one might write does Ct-Phi exist? and does CT-phy exist?

Philosophical reasoning about all things encounters the problems that Parmenides

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next Page >>