Results so far:
| Yes | 18% | 235 votes | Total: 1273 votes | |
| No | 82% | 1038 votes |
in the trajectory of Rourke's career with the words Oscar Winner for Best Actor attached to his name than if he's defeated by Penn.
I have yet to see Milk, but I'm guessing Penn didn't use performance enhancing drugs.
So, what am I not understanding?
How else would you classify whatever drugs Rourke seems to have taken for this role? He gave a performance. His performance was enhanced to some degree by his look and ability to train and do stunts (even if he didn't really take as many bumps as they'd like to have us believe) I don't have a metric to quantify how much his performance was enhanced - but given the downward trend of his career path, the few hits he has been able to produce, what clearly looked like the normal end of a career - given that it has wildly spiked outside of normal levels - I think it's not unreasonable to correlate that wild spike with the use of performance enhancing drugs.
So, what am I not understanding?
Where's the Congressional hearings? When's the grand jury convening? When's the raid on his house, gym, doctor's office? When will Sports Illustrated start a jihad to see that he is viewed in the same league as OJ Simpson? When will we talk about the children? The innocent, impressionable children?
What am I not...
Oh, you know what - things make more sense after I read this:
http://sports.yahoo.com/m lb/news;_ylt=AmVKR0i8rg8m8d1Yj OnOr8c5nYcB?slug=li-clear01140 9&prov=yhoo&type=lgns
You should read it, it's the biggest sports story of the year so far.
I'll short version it for you.
1. Use of the Clear, the drug Bonds is accused of taking, wasn't illegal.
2. The active ingredient wasn't classified as a steroid.
3. There are no studies to indicate that the clear enhances muscle growth.
I have been saying for years that the degree to which the federal government has attempted to imprison Barry Bonds for his miniscule part in a miniscule crime (less than $2000 worth of drugs was uncovered in the BALCO raids) is an utter abuse of power. I've been saying for the past 18 months that Bonds was going to beat this charge. And I've been saying for the past year that Barry Bonds is going to the Hall of Fame.
History will regard as silly the persecution of Barry Bonds, and of virtually all of those branded with the scarlet steroid S. Less because we'll decide that steroids were okay to take after all (although, we will) but because justice, legal and moral, requires some level of proportion and evenhandedness. Jason Giambi gets his own moustache day at Yankee Stadium; Andy Pettitte and Evander Holyfield get to keep their reputations as good guys (both overtly Christian, huh, imagine that) Arnold gets to be the Governor of California, everyone associated with the Bush Administration goes into the private sector, Mickey Rourke gets a Golden Globe, and Barry Bonds goes on trial in March.
I guess I understand it pretty well after all.
Learn more about this author, Jim Jividen.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by Ian Prichard
The main argument against steroid use in sports usually boils down to "fairness," and if we stop and look at those who complain
by Todd Pheifer
I didn't choose to write in this column because I advocate opening the floodgates to whatever substances people want to
Abusing their bodies.
The Use and Abuse of Drugs in the Olympic Games
According to a definition from World Book Dictionary,
by Karen Langst
Steroid should not be allowed in professional sports, other than use for medical purposes. If steroids are not for medical
Add your voice
Know something about Should steroid use ever be allowed in professional sports??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Featured Partner
Washington, D.C. Masons, members of the Free and Accepted Masons of Washington, D.C. Freemasonry is first and foremos...more
hide