There are 6 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #5 by Helium's members.
"The" truth about writing rules is that a writer must have a solid grasp of them. "My" truth about writing rules is that they are sometimes best broken. Whether or not I actually have any right to establish my own truth is something of which even I am not entirely sure. Still, I've often found that it is when I've broken the occasional writing rule that what I've written is most well received.
This is not to say that I am opposed to good grammar (to the contrary, I have always had a very deep appreciation for the ways the "building blocks" of the written word can be perfectly and systematically connected, resulting in an "architecture" of precision and perfect order). No, I continue to have that extremely deep appreciation for the precision and effectiveness of good grammar. Good writing cannot exist without the writer's having a solid understanding of good grammar. Good grammar, however, will never be enough to assure that the writing will be considered, "great writing".
Beyond just a good understanding of grammar, of course, there are also rules that are specific to producing written material. While grammar rules may be the "building blocks" of the written word, writing rules could be considered "the glue" that holds those blocks together. Writing rules could also be compared to a foundation or a blue print. The point is they are a separate set of rules from grammar rules. When a writer has a solid grasp of both sets of rules the result is generally a piece of writing that would be considered, "good writing".
Most of us, however, are aware of at least a few pieces of music or art that stand out because the artist chose to break away (at least a little) from conventional rules, and create something particularly unique. It isn't just in the area of music or painting that creativity sometimes breaks away from conventional rules. The same thing can happen with theatre, dance, "The Big Screen", or any number of other creative endeavors. Artists who break the rules generally need to have an understanding of them in the first place, and also have confidence enough to break away from them a little. While there is no doubt that rule-breaking can result in something that would be simply be considered, "bad"; there are those times when the artist discovers he has created something that has managed to perfectly convey what it is he had hoped it would.
As writers, we can't write with the idea of hoping to create something "great". Neither would it be the least bit advisable
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by Angela Magee
Some writing rules are important. Editors are swamped with submissions and if yours is filled with verbs that don't agree
Whenever writers get together to critique work, you'll hear alleged "Rules" being mentioned. Rules are dangerous things:
In order to determine the truth about writing rules, we first of all have to consider what are perceived as writing rules.
by Elton Gahr
W. Somerset Maughan once said, "There are three rules for writing the novel. Unfortunately, no one knows what they are."
"The" truth about writing rules is that a writer must have a solid grasp of them. "My" truth about writing rules is that
View All Articles on:
The Truth about Writing "Rules"
Add your voice
Know something about The Truth about Writing "Rules"?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Featured Partner
OneWorld United States publishes US and international perspectives on global issues gathered from OneWorld partners w...more
hide