1 of 2

Write now Article Tools

When engaging a technologically superior enemy, the basis for asymmetrical warfare has been set. Simply defined asymmetrical warfare is the type of war where the sides fighting are unevenly matched militarily. Thus the question becomes what produces military asymmetry or what makes one side more technologically superior than the other? We can understand technology not only as a physical term involving the presence or the ability to acquire the latest computers, and weapons but also it's effect on how the force employs and deploys that technology. Thus technology affects the material on the battlefield and the organization of the force that uses that technology.

Material can be defined as the physical presence on the battlefield, such as weapons, computers, vehicles etc that each side brings to bear on the battle but also funding and research that is required to create that material. Organization can be described as how each side employs the technology but also how it deploys that technology. Any technologically superior force will have more material and a higher level of organization for employing and deploying its forces.

Furthermore it can be assumed that it costs, in man power and money, a great deal to produce material and the accompanying organization surrounding the technology is uses. Thus we can assume there is an underlying level of organization, a bureaucracy and logistical system, that allows the technologically superior force to move its material to the field for employment and deployment. Consequently, this bureaucracy and logistical system, whether it is state or corporate born, creates a degree of rigidity in the technologically superior force.

So what can a technologically inferior force do to counter a technologically superior enemy? Being highly adaptive, avoid direct engagement, high attack celerity and go for "soft" parts. Realize that the superior force is at a disadvantage for being superior in material and organization in terms of technology. That is the inferior force should extend the battlefield not just to encompass the superior force's material and organization on the field but underlying bureaucracy and logistics. The inferior force should embrace opposite mechanics than the superior force, less dependence on technology meaning less material and a looser organization.

When engaging a superior force it is important to remember the saying, "He who sets the terms of the war sets the terms for the peace." Or slightly modified, who sets

• 1
• 2
• next page >>

Add your voice

Know something about Military theory: Engaging a technologically superior enemy?
We want to hear your view. Write now!