Home > Politics, News & Issues > US Law & Justice > Constitutional & Contract Law
Created on: December 28, 2008 Last Updated: December 25, 2010
Now that the 2008 presidential campaign over, and its corollary processes of democracy in national, state and local politics having also concluded another season of reinforcing (or redefining!) the will of the majority, I am compelled to ponder the implied again mantra that the majority should always have their way. I am driven to ask, with my metaphorical hands on my hips, just why the "capital M" Majority, simply by merely BEING the majority, should have the authority and power and control to determine legal standards, cultural norms, and public (and PRIVATE!) moral decisions - no - morality itself!
I, for one, have come to the conclusion that almost never does 50.1% of any demographic even bother an effort to inform themselves about the issues on which they arbitrarily get a chance to have influence. How does a particular issue become public domain? Somebody decides, and is so driven and ambitious to do the work to muster public support, that this policy or that practice or some other matter of allegedly oh-so-immense public import that they become a squeaky wheel that our democracy does rightfully allow to find voice and effect.
But, should this ideal that the average citizen can, albeit often or even typically with tremendous work, and a better-than-average understanding of the American political and/or democratic process, always rightfully go unchecked? Some would argue that the vote itself IS that check - that if some nut decided to put a question on the ballot to make it a law, for example, to rename 'french fries' as "Freedom Fries" - the intelligent majority would do the right thing and knock this assinine pettiness, itself a mockery of the deadly serious matter of societal standards and consequences, right on its ass by an obvious 100%. I fear, however, that it would look more like 65%/35% against - and even that such a proposal, in the right (no, very wrong!) national moment and milieu, would actually pass!
These things do happen! I'll not go all cliche' and reference the OBVIOUS national "oops!" America has been suffering for a certain unmentionable number of years. I'll instead turn my attention to a proposal brought to the voters in the state of California - the so-called and I say infamous "Proposition 8".
This proposition "...ELIMINATES RIGHT OF SAMESEX COUPLES TO MARRY. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.
Changes the California Constitution to eliminate the right of same-sex couples to marry in California. Provides that only marriage between
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
California's Proposition 8: Negating the Constitution and the Bill of Rights
by SLLawson
The writers of this country's Constitution and our Bill of Rights strategically placed within them safeguards to ensure
Marriage the Union of one Man and one Woman!
On November 4, 2008 the people of California voted to amend the State Constitution
In May of 2010, the Courts once again angered Californian voters; this time, the Federal District Judge Vaughn Walker went
by Rick Badman
When people vote to abolish their freedoms which men and women bled and died to obtained and others bled and died to defend,
Now that the 2008 presidential campaign over, and its corollary processes of democracy in national, state and local politics
View All Articles on: California's Proposition 8: Negating the Constitution and the Bill of Rights
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Can racial profiling be a useful way to identify potential criminals?
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Text and Academic Authors Association
The Text and Academic Authors Association (TAA) is the only authoring association devoted exclusively to serving textbook and academic authors. TAA was established in 1987 for those interested in developing and publishing educational...more