Title endorsed in part by:
Results so far:
| Yes | 43% | 175 votes | Total: 409 votes | |
| No | 57% | 234 votes |
Regardless of the paper or plastic we use to purchase goods and services, price variations will continue to occur both seasonally and regionally. Of course a global currency could "work". The tokens of value we currently use worldwide have, in truth, no real value of their own. Currency merely represents the level of confidence buyers and sellers have in the relative worth in their personal exchange.
Clearly, national pride and patriotic feathers would be ruffled with the adoption of a global currency, but those bumps in the road to trade would be temporary. Currency has taken a multitude of forms throughout human history. Shells, beads, debit cards, gold coins have all been used for the same purpose: to represent an agreed upon value.
The adoption of a global currency will not change the fact that the wealthy will pay more for their food and shelter than the poor. Why? Because they can. A wealthy person generally wants to pay more simply to show that they can. The basic supply and demand rules of economics will still apply. A loaf of bread may be worth x units of currency to one person, while that same loaf may only be worth y units of currency to another person and those two consumers will shop accordingly. The basic distribution of goods and services would not drastically change with a global currency. In light of the Euro, the Germans still sell their prized cuckoo clocks and the Italians still sell their leather goods. The only differences are the increased comparative clarity of those exchanges and the loss of income to money changers.
There is no need for exchange rates or money changers with a global currency. The purchase of products and services would be closer to a free market economy in that buyers and sellers would be better able to compare the true prices being considered. Money lenders would be forced to better compete with each other, to the consumer's advantage, with the elimination of fluctuating exchange rates.
The regional and seasonal differences in price would better reflect true supply and demand and be less swayed by geopolitics. Governments would be less able to flood or withhold their currency if all nations used the same one. Consumers would be the greatest beneficiaries to a global economy. They would be better able to make financial decisions without the constant fluctuations imposed on financial markets by the political arena.
There is no denying that we live in a time of global economics. The adoption of a global currency would facilitate smoother transactions and a better informed consumer.
Learn more about this author, Kate Johnson.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
The idea of a single global currency is not only feasible in our day and age, it has been effectively implemented a number
by Colin Morley
This is a truly fascinating debate. As I write, the 'yes' side of the argument is losing, yet has more than twice as many
A single global currency makes the assumption that all of humanity has the same needs. Nations of the world have different
by John Talleos
One world single currency has a nice ring to it. It's has though the world were one country with one identity. This is the
Add your voice
Know something about Could a single global currency work??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Featured Partner
Per Scholas is a non-profit organization dedicated to using technology to improve the lives of people in low-income c...more
hide