Getting it right about Islam today: Jihadists vs. peaceful Muslims
Of course there are violent Muslims and peaceful Muslims. However, a non-peaceful Muslim is not a 'Jihadist.' For starters, is a Muslim criminal who robs a bank a 'Jihadist'? Is a Muslim husband who beats his wife a 'Jihadist?' Of course not. I understand that what is meant by the term 'Jihadist' as used in the title for this article is a Muslim involved in violent acts of international terrorism. But that is not what the word 'Jihadist' means.
Jihad is a word like any other in Arabic and it means 'effort.' A 'jihadist' is someone who exerts an effort. When used in a religious context, to be a 'Jihadist' is to use your mind, to understand the principles of the religion and, above all, to adapt these principles to the evolving times. It can also refer to the spiritual struggle against evil, in your mind and your comportment. Until a few year ago, this was somewhat of an antiquated term.
They taught us all about it in primary school. The first Muslim 'Jihadists' were a handful of Muslims fighting in self-defense against those (non Muslim Arabs) who persecuted them for their beliefs. Later, the zealous Muslims who had just discovered God and the religion of Islam (sort of like Born Again Christians) decided to spread the 'true faith' to the four corners of the world (somewhat like the Crusaders). They wanted to bestow the gift of Islam to all the unfortunate people who were not Muslim (like the Missionaries in Africa, Asia etc.). So they rode off to spread the word of God - and it was an effort. It was an effort that most of them (there were a few rascals, scoundrels, thieves and murderers among there numbers of course) believed they were doing in the name of God. Convinced they were serving God and spreading his word, they believed they were 'Jihadists'.
Recently, as we all know, growing numbers of people who happen to be Muslim have elected to use this term to further their own ends. Because ignorance and poverty are, alas, rampant in many Muslim countries, and young men are hungry and above all, frustrated, these self-elected 'Islamist leaders' have managed to recruit armies of followers. Using money and false interpretations of Islam, it was easy to manipulated frustrations and feelings of injustice to persuaded these young people that the terrorist acts they were to commit would make them a new breed of Jihadists.
Has anyone stopped to wonder why these new-fangled, blood thirsty Jihadists have
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
If we could get one thing right today, it would be our ability to recognize a false paradigm when we see one. One could
by Gary Betts
I have just finished reading an article under this title which paints Islam as a violent religion. I quote its last line,
Getting it right about Islam today: Jihadists vs. peaceful Muslims
Of course there are violent Muslims and peaceful Muslims.
Mohammedanism is a religion without remorse-it lacks the concept of sin. While their may be Muhammedans at peace the religion
by Edward Hall
He said to them, "But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and
View All Articles on:
Getting it right about Islam today: Jihadists vs. peaceful Muslims
Add your voice
Know something about Getting it right about Islam today: Jihadists vs. peaceful Muslims?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Takes All Types has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse Takes All Types' f...more
hide