despite the fact that the few readers they had were willing to pay for it. As a long-suffering Chicago Cubs fan, I need to get the news first-hand on the team's trials and tribulations. The Tribune has some pretty good news articles, too, although I'm not too wild about their flashy redesign-doesn't seem to be as much to read anymore.
When the Tribune discontinued the home delivery, they politely informed me that I could still read the paper online. I knew that already. But it's not the same. I can find the same six or seven Cub stories that run during the season and read them individually, even finding reader comments that I didn't get before. But the reading experience isn't as free. With the paper in front of me, I scan willfully, using those 100 billion neurons or whatever it is in the human brain to determine what interests me.
It allows writers and advertisers to do their best to reach out and grab me: That's the democracy of communication. The fact that this package still comes in an old ink-on-paper package doesn't really matter. It just works.
As a 59-year-old, lifelong newspaper reader (chiefly sports as a kid growing up in Boston), I know I'm not the "choice" audience that the newspaper wants to reach-those 25-to-54 year-olds that carry so much weight in our economy. But I also know I'm not alone. Reading a paper online is not the same as having the paper in your hands.
There I've said it. At the risk of being labeled a Luddite or dinosaur or whatever anti-tech term you choose to use, the fact is that a paper is easier to read when I can spread it out, fold it and bunch it up than the sterile version that arrives online. I won't waste time extolling the virtues of the Internet because that's done better elsewhere. The fact is that the World Wide Web is a blessing. There's a tremendous amount of information at everyone's fingertips and it keeps getting refined.
But Internet success doesn't mean that the newspaper becomes obsolete. It does mean that the newspaper has to change, an awareness that the industry is already working on. A conference at the University of Missouri in September celebrated the journalism school's 100th year but also addressed the many challenges facing the newspaper industry.
A New York-based outfit is now doing investigative pieces on an as-needed basis. Journalists are paid by the job. It's part of that new business model, I mentioned. We heard about some of those Internet-only papers. They're struggling because of a lack of ad
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by Francis Jock
Every weekend, for the past year or so, my wife takes a small vacation by going to visit her elderly cousins that live
by Colin Dennis
"People don't actually read newspapers," Marshall McLuhan, the Canadian philosopher, said. "They get into them every morning
"There will be blood on the streets and it will be over for some newspapers." This was the view of Cameron Yuill, CEO of
by Ryan Gray
Although it may be impossible to believe for most people, there are members of our society who either don't have access
by Paul Lines
Is the Internet a threat to printed newspapers? Despite popular opinion, I do not think so. The reasons for this opinion
View All Articles on:
Internet as a threat to newspapers
Add your voice
Know something about Internet as a threat to newspapers?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
The Goldwater Institute was founded in 1988 by a small group of entrepreneurial Arizonans with the blessing of Senato...more
hide