Home > Religion & Spirituality > Religion & Spirituality (Other)
Created on: November 04, 2008 Last Updated: November 13, 2008
The problem of evil is, perhaps, the most serious challenge leveled against the religious believer. While it does not constitute a "proof" of atheism, it does call into question the nature of God as most theists understand him. Simply put, the problem of evil asks how we can justify the existence of God, and belief in God, with all the evil there is in the world. In philosophical terms the problem arises for those who accept the following three propositions:
1. God is Omnipotent.
2. God is Omni-benevolent.
3. Evil exists.
It may not be obvious why accepting these three propositions entails a problem and so we should clarify what each one implies. In doing this, and outlining the possible solutions to the problem I will be following the lead of a philosopher named J. L. Mackie, who in 1971 published an important article on the subject titled "Evil and Omnipotence."
Proposition one, at the very least, entails that God has the ability to eliminate evil. While there are things that an omnipotent being is incapable of, such as violating the laws of logic, it doesn't seem to be too much of a leap to suppose that God could eliminate evil. Proposition two, at the very least, seems to entail that God is inclined to eliminate evil. This should clarify the problem at hand. If God is both capable of and inclined to eliminate evil, there should be no evil. But evil does exist which demands an explanation. In clarifying proposition three many philosophers make a distinction between natural and moral evil. Natural evil includes such things as floods, earthquakes, famines, pain, and disease. They are naturally occurring things which have negative effects on human beings. Moral evil includes actions caused by human beings which have negative effects on other human beings. This would include such acts as murder, rape, genocide, and torture. Some philosophers have suggested that we only deal with moral evils since naturally occurring things, such as floods and earthquakes, are not inherently evil. They are only interpreted as evil if human beings happen to be affected. Still, we are left with the problem of explaining moral evil. We will consider various solutions to the problem which are called "theodicies." Theodicy is from the Latin for justification since we are, in essence, trying to justify God's existence in the face of evil.
Mackie points out that there are three perfectly adequate solutions that completely solve the problem. The trouble with these solutions is that they create
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
God allows suffering
The problem of evil is, perhaps, the most serious challenge leveled against the religious believer. While it does not constitute
by M.J. Webb
Any question that begins ‘why would God...’ cannot be used as evidence against the existence of the God of the
Why do good things happen to bad people and bad things happen to good people? Why are some babies born to live a day and
Thomas Merton lived his life completely within the twentieth century. He lived between the dates of January 31, 1915, and
His permissive will...
I've always heard it said: "Misery loves company." I have found out, sometimes misery goes too deep
View All Articles on: God allows suffering
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Is religion only for those that can't accept responsibility for their own faults and failings?
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Marching Mountains organizes at the grassroots level while creating and leveraging Internet technology to empower our networks of involved people. Marching Mountains seeks grants and corporate sponsorship in addition to fundraising to pr...more