Home > Politics, News & Issues > US Politics > US Leaders
Created on: October 13, 2008
The use of such sweeping terms such as good' and evil' as policy-defining pillars in a secular society such as the United States of America might seem difficult to justify and understand. I will argue, however, that the notion of absolute evil has always been present in the American psyche, barely covered by secular mentality and contemporary conventions, and that the attacks on America that happened in 2001 have served to revive in their society and politics the image of Satan. By Satan' I mean not so much the fallen angel of Christian mythology, but the personification of evil, whose most marked characteristic is precisely its changeable nature. In the next few paragraphs I will draw upon the work of Richard Kearney, Andrew Delbanco, Peter Singer, and Jean Baudrillard, amongst others, in order to analyze the ethical, practical and political reasons and consequences of the policies adopted after those fateful attacks. I will also attempt to shed some light onto why the policies adopted by the Bush White House which have continued to prove extremely unpopular amongst the international community have been accepted in a seemingly unquestioning manner by a large proportion of the American population.
In Death of Satan, Andrew Delbanco argues that America started its colonized history with a system of beliefs in which its inhabitants had a clearly defined conception of evil - materialized in the figure of Satan and has then proceeded in a relentless advance towards secular rationality. Since Delbanco's book was published in 1995, however, the direction of this change has been effectively reversed. The current situation in the United States following the change in presidential administration from Bill Clinton to George W. Bush and most significantly - the attacks of September 11th 2001, have reinforced the psychological need in Americans for clear boundaries between good' and evil', and that is exactly what their current president and his administration are providing them with a working concept of absolute evil, materialized and concentrated in the now almost iconic figure of Osama Bin Laden.
President Bush's initial reaction to those attacks, Richard Kearney comments, was to divide the world into good and evil. In the days immediately following the terror, he declared a crusade' against the evil scourge of terrorism' (2003: 111). This move towards a dyadic philosophy where all issues are starkly contrasted in black and white and all moral choices and consequently
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Views on George Bush
As a writer and academic who has actively followed US politics for over 40 years, I can honestly say that the state of the
by James Boyd
This discussion is presumably about George W. Bush, and not his father. In the midst of all the ranting and raving about
Just over a year remains for the Bush administration, an administration long caught in the grip of pathos. These have been
by Dan Weinberg
"Honorably Discharged?"
It is too bad that Dan Rather lost his CBS Anchorman position because of poor journalistic ethics:
by Bob Schmidt
George W. Bush, the 43rd President of the United States, is ending his presidency with the lowest approval rating of any
View All Articles on: Views on George Bush
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Should the Freedom of Information Act cover Congressional records?
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Presidential Climate Action Project (PCAP)
The Presidential Climate Action Project (PCAP) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse PCAP's featured titles, pick an issue and write! You can also donate your article earnings. Share...more