There are 30 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #3 by Helium's members.
Title endorsed in part by:
Results so far:
| Yes | 43% | 174 votes | Total: 405 votes | |
| No | 57% | 231 votes |
Do we need a single global currency?
I think it was Margaret Thatcher who said we already have a single global currency it's called the US dollar. That was in relation to the impending Euro. Not that the dollar is performing at its best at the moment, but it does get around, albeit it in tandem with other local currencies. And there's the rub; a single global currency sounds good and may make sense, but after investigating both sides of the issue, I don't think it will work for several reasons.
The Pros:
A single global currency would get rid of exchange rates and a myriad of other languishing currencies, thereby making financial trading easier and less perilous in less secure times. There'd be no more news reports of dollars to sterling; yen to euros; or roubles to rupees. This would also get rid of a whole industry of money changers and dealers, possibly leading to a more streamlined and manageable banking system. That could be a good thing. Would that have made this financial crisis better to deal with, with no foreign exchange rates and foreign money devaluations to live through? A single global currency couldn't be devalued against another country's making any funding more accessible.
Many countries around the world have updated their currencies with a few minor disruptions (e.g. Britain's shillings to sterling, Continental Europe's conversion to Euros), so adopting a single global currency maybe one continent at a time may help ease any disruptions.
Having a single currency would benefit financial security as black markets of alternative currencies would cease. Since everyone would own and know what a legitimate bill/coin looked like, it would be far easier to spot a fake. Better re-use and recycling of bills and coins would also be a benefit of a single currency. The costs in savings from not having to set up language translations of various currencies in shops, travel agents, banks, and on signs, would also be an advantage. Advertising, marketing and promotion could be targeted more affectively for one currency rather than several. A single currency would save money in bureaucracy.
Having a single currency would make it easier to have a cashless system. Paying by a credit system, chip and pin card, mobile phone, etc would be easier when spending or sending money around the world with no exchange commission or charges applied.
In an age of globalisation, a single global currency would add to the already growing arena of the global village. Weaker nations would
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
A single global currency makes the assumption that all of humanity has the same needs. Nations of the world have different
by John Talleos
One world single currency has a nice ring to it. It's has though the world were one country with one identity. This is the
The idea of a single global currency is not only feasible in our day and age, it has been effectively implemented a number
by Colin Morley
This is a truly fascinating debate. As I write, the 'yes' side of the argument is losing, yet has more than twice as many
Add your voice
Know something about Could a single global currency work??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Featured Partner
Enclave is a church in Turlock, California that is exploring what it means to follow Jesus in a rapidly changing cult...more
hide