There are 20 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #5 by Helium's members.
Results so far:
| Yes | 72% | 127 votes | Total: 176 votes | |
| No | 28% | 49 votes |
The 2008 Wall street financial meltdown was caused in part by lobbying by the financial sector. The financial problems began in a nexus of lobby supported pro-banking legislation, lack of oversight, and developments within the mortgage industry and mortgage backed derivatives markets. These circumstances took place in the wake of the Savings and Loans crisis of the 1980's and in the midst of one of the most prosperous decades the United States has ever seen. During the 1990's the financial scenario(s) and economic picture didn't look so bleak for Wall Street, however new developments in the securities industry pointed heavily to economic thought that grouped banking deregulation with risk and wide-eyed political decision making.
In the years preceding the 2008 Wall street melt down, a flurry of lobbying activity by the Banking industry led to a loosening of mortgage lending practices according to Lisa Lerer of 'Politco' magazine. Specifically she states, " During those years, the mortgage industry pressed Congress to roll back strong state rules that sought to stem the rise of predatory tactics used by lenders and brokers to place homeowners in high-cost mortgages." This is further verified by opensecrets.org's lobbying totals from 1998-2008 in which the Finance, Insurance and Real Estate industries are recorded as being the largest lobbying group in terms of a dollar amount over $3.2 Billion.
The connection between financial lobbying and the Wall street crisis is also present in the case of Senator Phil Gramm of Texas who is stated by Lerer, as being a former banking lobbyist turned politician and co-author of the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999. The relationship between the Financial Services Modernization Act and the Wall street meltdown of 2008 is in the lack of regulatory fail safes within the act. Moreover, to exacerbate things, little was done by congress to limit the massive risky mortgage derivative spending by large banks in regard to complex leveraged derivatives and as insured by mortgage default swaps. This was in part because of more lobbying.
In the book 'Infectious Greed' by Frank Partnoy, Partnoy illustrates the presence of the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) in Washington D.C. politics. Moreover, Derivatives lobbyists successfully influenced key law makers to abort legislation against unregulated 'off balance sheet' derivatives assets. Eventually, the combination of loosely enacted banking deregulation laws,
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by T. M. Beeker
ENRON was proof positive of this situation. The depth of corruption and blatant manipulation of the market should have resulted
by Jeremy Horne
Why should one be surprised about this assertion?
People do not understand context.. Think of your little boxes of "campaign
by Lisa Bells
It seems that Wall Street has become the focus of the world, for its financial crisis and then the bailout program. We witnessed
by Rayne Britt
I don't believe lobbyists are the reason for this particular problem. I have seen a lot of good ideas and insights into the
Add your voice
Know something about Did campaign contributions and lobbying by the financial sector contribute to the meltdown on Wall Street??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Featured Partner
Text and Academic Authors Association
The Text and Academic Authors Association (TAA) is the only authoring association devoted exclusively to serving text...more
hide