Home > Religion & Spirituality > Atheism & Agnosticism
Created on: October 09, 2008
The largest intellectual battle of recent times has actually not been one religion versus another or even atheism versus any conception of theism...but instead a battle between people who should be friends.
It's the battle between atheists and agnostics.
Only through a definitional battle can these two groups be placed on different sides, when actually, agnosticism does not necessarily disclude or exclude atheism. Atheism does not necessarily disclude or exclude agnosticism.
Some agnostics and theists will point to the dictionary and then triumph: "ah, our definition of atheism is correct! It is a faith like any other and we refuse to be a part of it!" Indeed, I see two major definitions for atheism as per dictionary.com1.the doctrine or belief that there is no God.
2.disbelief in the existence of a supreme being or beings. Theists and some agnostics will point to the first definition and point out then, that atheism is a positive belief that requires a positive faith. How can one believe there is no God without proof, either side will say? So, atheists are hypocritical and they actually require the same faith that theists do. This seems to help agnostics, who claim to be above the fray of both theism and atheism.
However, with this is a willful (or maybe not) ignorance of the second definition...while yes, a positive belief that there is no God would suffice for atheism, the second definition is critically important: it simply calls for the disbelief in the existence.
This requires more specific prodding on what exactly the nature of "disbelief" is. Going by the same definition from dictionary.com
1. the inability or refusal to believe or to accept something as true.
This appears to be a strong definition and unflattering to disbelievers of...well...anything...if one "refuses" to believe, a theist might say, that means they are set in stone and unable to change...they have decided that god doesn't exist and they will never change their ways. Some agnostics would go on to say, "Ah, but our position once again reigns supreme over atheism, because we don't "refuse" to believe...we simply don't know and don't make a decision."
However, things aren't so clear-cut...really, there are two questions to be asked:
1) Do you believe in a god?
2) Do you believe there is no god?
To characterize the positions...a theist would believe in the first statement...in other terms, they ACCEPT this claim as true. An atheist does NOT believe in the first position. They do not accept...they
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Atheists versus Agnostics
by Jack Roviere
The largest intellectual battle of recent times has actually not been one religion versus another or even atheism versus
by Tom Koecke
In an article I wrote for the title "Can God be Disproved," I called Atheism a religion, and challenged any atheist to debate
by Paul Erland
No word sets atheists to foaming at the mouth more than agnostic—not evangelical, not born-again, not even Baptist.
There is a mad, stupid belief among the majority of people, religious and irreligious alike, that theism, agnosticism, and
Atheism and agnosticism are words so loaded that when setting out to define them, one must do so twice in order to give
View All Articles on: Atheists versus Agnostics
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Are modern Muslim fatwas (religious orders issued by leaders of Islam) fueling Islamic extremism?
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Collegiate Society of America (CSAmerica)
The Collegiate Society of America (CSAmerica) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse CSAmerica's featured titles, pick an issue and write! You can also donate your article earnings. S...more