2 of 5

Write now Article Tools

Page 2 of 2

is government regulation and oversight that there is absolutely no chance that anything could slip through the cracks, and often don't bother researching things they purchase for their children.

The same goes for almost any product or service. We assume that because the banking industry is regulated that information we gather from a bank or mortgage company is going to be accurate and fair. We assume that everything they are doing is legal. We often don't bother to read the fine print and just trust whatever our banker or mortgage broker tells us. We don't perform due diligence. And we all see where that got us. If consumers would take responsibility for themselves and for their own purchases, companies would not be able to get away with the things that they currently get away with. A company that was dishonest, unethical, and did not care about its customers would quickly go out of business.

Under the current system, companies that are not successful or profitable are often propped up by the government. Oil companies get billions in subsidies (through actual financial subsidies as well as through government-sponsored infrastructure projects such as pipelines and roads run to remote drilling sites) and make billions in profits. Consumers still pay through the nose at the pump. But if the subsidies were removed, oil companies would start looking into ways to become more profitable, including alternative energy. The same goes for coal power, nuclear power, and many other polluting industries. If the subsidies disappeared, alternative energy companies would have a better shot in the marketplace, and consumers would have more choices.

The truth of the matter is that laissez-faire capitalism is the only moral economic system, the only system that allows people to pursue their own happiness and do things for their own good, instead of becoming sacrificial lambs for the "common good." When everyone is forced to make sacrifices for the "common good," everyone ends up miserable, except for the lowest, most corrupt elements of society (those who take the benefits stolen from others, but do not make any sacrifices of their own). How is this system just? How does this system help anyone? When a person is allowed to keep what they have rightfully earned (not that which is garnered from subsidies or coercive methods of obtaining wealth), and their neighbor is allowed to do the same, both are happier for it. When both are allowed to do the things they love to do just for their own sake, and without consideration for others (as long as what they are doing is not harming or coercing others), they are both happier and more fulfilled. These are essential elements to laissez-faire capitalism, and are just two of the reasons why it is the best and the only rational economic system ever devised.

Learn more about this author, Cameron Chapman.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

• << previous page
• 1
• 2

Add your voice

Know something about Critique: The Libertarian free trade argument?
We want to hear your view. Write now!