Home > Computers & Technology > Internet > Internet Issues
Created on: September 17, 2008
This will undoubtedly be earmarked as one of the most controversial issues of our time. For one because of the sheer amount of people involved, two because it spans the entire globe, and three because there are actual facts supporting both sides of the argument. It's interesting that this argument is viewed by so many subjectively, when in reality it's not subjective at all. There are laws in place that directly outlaw this.
Now, I am neither a proponent of or against downloading internet music in general, although I do think that the title "Internet music" is as broad as the side angle of a 747 Jetliner. There are many types of "Internet music", some of which advocate being downloaded for free so to lump all music on the Internet into one category is not realistic. For instance, there are bands looking to promote their music to land a record deal. These bands obviously want to get as many people as possible to download their music in hopes that they will make a name for themselves. There are also musicians (believe it or not) that are proponents of music downloads and advocate peer to peer networks. Groups like Steve Winwood, Jason Mraz, and Heart to name a few. Some have even claimed that P2P Networks have increased their exposure. Mraz states that half of the people who attend his concerts found him on P2P networks. These people pay for tickets and purchase band products like T-shirts and other concessions. These are the venues that help the bands most, financially anyway. It's the labels who profit most from Record sales.
So then, let's look at some of the major points of this argument. One side will have you believe that downloading songs off of the internet, even if only a few, is the equivalent of committing murder and the other side will have you believe that it is perfectly fine both legally and ethically.
Let's pretend for a moment, that I am the chief detective on solving this case once and for all. I have two interrogation rooms, both with cold, blank gray concrete walls, a wobbly desk with a chair on each side and a single hanging light directly above the table in each of the rooms. Hopefully that paints the picture of most interrogation rooms that we see on TV. In the first room I have representatives from the Record Industry and in the other, advocates for downloading music. Let's assume this argument focuses on the use of peer to peer networks for the alleged illegal downloading of copyrighted music.
Let's start with the Record Industry executives.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Is downloading Internet music theft?
by Leigh Goessl
There are two kinds of digital music downloads, legal and illegal. The first kind means the owner of the copyright has given
by Rachel Couch
Downloading music from the internet can be theft if someone is using a program such as Limewire, or Blubster to get music.
With technology comes changes that everyone must learn to adapt to. The Internet is a wonderful fun filled piece of technology
by Aoife Clarke
Oh the joys of modern music. Providing you have access to the Internet, any amount of your favourite music is merely a
by Daniel Cloud
If downloading internet music is theft, then we are all probably guilty. If you recorded mix tapes from the radio before
View All Articles on: Is downloading Internet music theft?
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
E-Commerce: Should you pay bloggers to review your products?
Click for your side.