There are 17 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #1 by Helium's members.
Results so far:
| No | 28% | 39 votes | Total: 140 votes | |
| Yes | 72% | 101 votes |
The presidential debates are coming. After going through numerous debates from both parties,especially democrats , it is only conceivable that the debates would see some action. However, should we leave the debates only to the big boys or should we let the firebrand third party candidates in for the debates? Let me explore the case for including former congressman Bob Barr and possibly the old warrior Ralph Nader into these debates. And how it would restore the freedom of speech of America.
Firstly, The Commission on Presidential Debates, a private, non-profit corporation, only allow candidates who poll above 15% nationally to be included in the presidential debates. This adds a serious dent to the commission's claim to be non-partisan. They are siding with the big guys who nevertheless treat the third party candidates as a thorn in their sides. A better way would be to include everyone that have made themselves into the ballot in at least 15% of the states, let us keep the number at 8 to round it off. This would eliminate unnecessary cacophony while opening up the stage for the candidates to come forward and express the views. Do you know why this is important?
Well, a lot of people, the so called independents who roam the aisle and choose which side to vote at the last moment, make that decision based on the presidential debates to see where the candidates stand on the issues, what plans they have up their sleeves to send the country in the right direction and also to see the integrity and strength that they display in the debates. This means that the third party candidates, being marginal in terms of visibility to the nation will have no chance to get their ideas across to the multitudes. Who knows what the people would decide once they see all the ideas being showcased in a nationally televised presidential debate? It is absolutely the spirit of democracy. This is the freedom of speech that the constitution guarantees. So are you saying that people do not think outside the box? Well, about that later.
At least the people of America are polling in a majority to get the third party candidates to be included in the debates. I am quoting straight from the Zogby International's website. "UTICA, New York - More than half of likely voters nationwide - 55% - want Republican-turned-Libertarian Bob Barr to participate in presidential debates this fall, while nearly half - 46% - said they think Ralph Nader should be allowed into the on-stage fray, the latest Zogby Interactive
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
The presidential debates are coming. After going through numerous debates from both parties,especially democrats , it is
Debates...? Is that what we are calling them? To even call these sored affairs debates is a gross misrepresentation which
Add your voice
Know something about Are US presidential debates too controlled to allow freedom of speech??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Featured Partner
Appleseed, a nonprofit network of 16 public interest justice centers in the United States and Mexico, uncovers and co...more
hide