Channel Button

There are 17 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #1 by Helium's members.

Debate_icon

Politics, News & Issues   >

US Elections (Other)

Get a Widget for this title

Are US presidential debates too controlled to allow freedom of speech?

Results so far:

No
28% 39 votes Total: 140 votes
Yes
72% 101 votes

The presidential debates are coming. After going through numerous debates from both parties,especially democrats , it is only conceivable that the debates would see some action. However, should we leave the debates only to the big boys or should we let the firebrand third party candidates in for the debates? Let me explore the case for including former congressman Bob Barr and possibly the old warrior Ralph Nader into these debates. And how it would restore the freedom of speech of America.

Firstly, The Commission on Presidential Debates, a private, non-profit corporation, only allow candidates who poll above 15% nationally to be included in the presidential debates. This adds a serious dent to the commission's claim to be non-partisan. They are siding with the big guys who nevertheless treat the third party candidates as a thorn in their sides. A better way would be to include everyone that have made themselves into the ballot in at least 15% of the states, let us keep the number at 8 to round it off. This would eliminate unnecessary cacophony while opening up the stage for the candidates to come forward and express the views. Do you know why this is important?

Well, a lot of people, the so called independents who roam the aisle and choose which side to vote at the last moment, make that decision based on the presidential debates to see where the candidates stand on the issues, what plans they have up their sleeves to send the country in the right direction and also to see the integrity and strength that they display in the debates. This means that the third party candidates, being marginal in terms of visibility to the nation will have no chance to get their ideas across to the multitudes. Who knows what the people would decide once they see all the ideas being showcased in a nationally televised presidential debate? It is absolutely the spirit of democracy. This is the freedom of speech that the constitution guarantees. So are you saying that people do not think outside the box? Well, about that later.

At least the people of America are polling in a majority to get the third party candidates to be included in the debates. I am quoting straight from the Zogby International's website. "UTICA, New York - More than half of likely voters nationwide - 55% - want Republican-turned-Libertarian Bob Barr to participate in presidential debates this fall, while nearly half - 46% - said they think Ralph Nader should be allowed into the on-stage fray, the latest Zogby Interactive


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

Are US presidential debates too controlled to allow freedom of speech?

Yes
No
  • 1 of 6

    by EMoore

    Opposing candidates find ways of overcoming restrictions when debating? They are savvy enough to use their words to get in

    read more

  • 2 of 6

    by Jacqueline Foster

    Presidential debates are controlled in order to allow freedom of speech. The candidates are limited to the issue at hand

    read more

Add your voice

Know something about Are US presidential debates too controlled to allow freedom of speech??
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

102314

Featured Partner

Appleseed

Appleseed, a nonprofit network of 16 public interest justice centers in the United States and Mexico, uncovers and co...more

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA