Channel Button

There are 4 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #3 by Helium's members.

Personal Finance   >

Mortgages & Home Loans

Get a Widget for this title

The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008

Much has been made about the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 and its consequences. Undoubtedly, it contains a lot of things that the average American consumer will find advantageous and helpful, but hidden amidst all of the wordy language and the thickness of the document are a few things that perhaps have not been exposed as extensively as necessary.

For instance, tucked away towards the end of the document is a change on the Capital Gains Exclusion rule, and one that could affect sellers of real estate quite harshly.

Up until the enactment of the HERA, a home seller could gain up to $250,000 of profits derived from the sale tax-free, with only one condition: the seller had to have lived in the house for at least two of the past five years. Simple enough, right?

Not anymore. Now, under HERA, someone that wants to sell a home and wants to calculate how much of that profit would be tax-free would have to perform a relatively complicated formula: simplified, put the amount of days that the property has been the primary residence over the amount of days that they have owned the property, then multiply it by the profit.

For example: say that you have purchased a house exactly 3 years ago, but have only resided in the home for 2 years. 3 years equals 1,095 days, while 2 years equals 730 days. Divided, that means that you will derive about 67% of the profit as tax free. If your profit was $100,000, that means that you will gain about $67,000 tax-free. Undoubtedly, this equation can get monumentally more complex, but as a principle, the example applies.

Essentially, it means that the less you've lived in a house that you've owned, the less money that you can expect to claim as tax-free. It's not really a discouragement from selling property, but it is an unfortunate side-effect of an otherwise beneficial law.

It really does not seem that it will be like a big hamper on property sales; after all, the market was already in disarray and this will not force people to withdraw the prospective sales of their house. Instead, it is simply a way for our government to tax more and more money from any profits that we as citizens make.

Learn more about this author, Michael Mikolajczyk.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008

  • 1 of 4

    by Ebey Soman

    The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 was recently passed into law with a lot of positives for the American People.

    read more

  • 2 of 4

    by Rachel Stockton

    Some accountants do not see much in the way of positives in the Housing and Economic Recovery Act; I do. However, I certainly

    read more

  • 3 of 4

    by Michael Mikolajczyk

    Much has been made about the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 and its consequences. Undoubtedly, it contains a lot

    read more

  • 4 of 4

    by David Mc

    The American dream is the foundation for our democratic republic. The dream was the young homeowner with family and job climbing

    read more

Add your voice

Know something about The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008?
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

Helium Debate

Cast your vote!

Should the federal government bail out student loan holders?

Click for your side.

175096

Featured Partner

Tigerlily Foundation

Tigerlily Foundation has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse Tigerlily Fou...more

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA