Where Knowledge Rules

Sciences:

Physical Science

Debate_icon Get a Widget for this title

Is time real or relative?

Results so far:

Relative
69% 631 votes Total: 921 votes
Real
31% 290 votes
2 of 36
Relative

Page 6 of 6

terrestrial measurments coincide. The other explanation would be to realize that all the clocks in the laboratory (and, indeed, in the rest of the world) are wrong by the order of t"/t'. But does v represent 30 kps, or 270 kps, or something else entirely different?

So it would appear that for one inertial system going faster than another, time is as real as it gets, but also, indeed, relative.

In fact, it seems that by inserting c for v in our conclusion above (let v = c), laboratory time slows to zero, leading to the uncomfortable idea that if we were to ride along with a photon crossing 18 billion light years of the known universe, the trip would be instantaneous.

Lest we be disturbed by the philosophical implications of this, recall that some fringing effects were recorded by previous interferometry, albeit thought to be of a magnitude well below machine error. So perhaps we don't know EVERYTHING yet.

But this led Einstein to formulate the fundamental postulate of Relativity, insisting that, "The Laws of Physics are the same in all uniformly moving reference frames." In other words, if we're all moving at the same speed, no matter what it is, there's nothing to worry about.

But the worrisome dilemma of a photon experiencing zero trip time to cross the universe no doubt had even Einstein in awe...perhaps even in doubt...a shadow of it seems to surface briefly in his "Electrodynamics" when he wrote, cryptically, on page 12 of the paper:

"For velocities greater than that of light our deliberations become meaningless; we shall, however, find in what follows, that the velocity of light in our theory plays the part, physically, of an infinitely great velocity."

Or as Carl Sagan liked to say, "There's something strange about the speed of light."

I would add that there's SOMETHING STRANGE about space-time.

It is a strangeness that will take perhaps the next generation of scientific revolutionaries to figure out.

Learn more about this author, Joe Murray.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

Is time real or relative?

Relative
  • 1 of 36

    by Dave Nocera

    Techncially we are all time travelers, sitting at your computer you are moving through time. We are submerged in time and

    read more

  • 2 of 36

    by Joe Murray

    The theory of relative time arose through the six classic pillars of science: a field observation, supporting verifiable

    read more

Real
  • 1 of 17

    by S E Garrett

    All of Reality as we perceive it is Relative Awareness and ambiguous Time, one of the three essential prerequisites for

    read more

  • 2 of 17

    by Gary C. Gibson

    The inflation of space-time from a zero-dimensional state at the initial singularity was universal time=0. The implicit

    read more

Add your voice

Know something about Is time real or relative??
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

190286

Featured Partner

The MAGIC Foundation for children's growth

Major Aspects of Growth In Children (MAGIC) is made up of 25,000+ families whose children (and affected adults) have ...more

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA